ghandi9

joined 1 year ago
[–] ghandi9@lemmy.meg.li 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah wtf was that comment and how is it upvoted? Sure, OP doesn't need to take shit and can fight back, but "ruining people's lifes"? Conspiring with other people to "make him wish he was never born"? Gerting him fired? How is that supposed to be useful? How does that solve anything?

[–] ghandi9@lemmy.meg.li 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wtf is this comment? So you either "turn the other cheek" and just let him harrass you, or else "you have to ruin his life and make him wish he was never born"?

You are right that OP doesn't have to "turn the other cheek" and does not have to put up with people's shit, but just because you should not turn yourself into a masochist that does not mean you should turn yourself into a sadist..

[–] ghandi9@lemmy.meg.li 8 points 1 year ago

I have been running my own server for a few years now. I would describe it more as an alternative for What's App or Signal than an alternative to discord. I think it's more used in a professional/and or government setting for organisations who need to run their own services.

Also, Matrix is just the protocol behind it and there are quite a few different clients for it, the most popular one is element. Lemmy.world also has a link to their Matrix instance.

[–] ghandi9@lemmy.meg.li 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What I mean that you’re only point is “you’re not the majority so shut up”.

My only point is "you're not the majority", you don't even need to shut up, you can have whatever opinion you want to have, just don't pretend to represent "the community" when you don't..

Me having a mini jack in the phone doesn’t mean that you, a person that doesn’t care about one, is somehow disadvantaged.

It's an additional port that needs to be included into the design and that needs physical space. And it's another way to get dust and/or fluids into the phone, all without any benefit for me or most users.. You can claim that the impact is minimal, but there still is an unnecessary impact.

You agreed already that Apple didn’t remove the mini jack to make the phone smaller, it was just to make more money.

Everything apple does and other companies do is to make more money, that's pretty much the entire motivation behind anything companies do..

It’s the same 7 years later, people still don’t believe it’s for any other reason than to make a little bit more money.

Of course it is to "make more money", or rather to save money on things that have no measurable benefit for most users..

Ok, so you’re a docile consumer. When company does something you don’t like you just say 'well, I’m in the minority, I will still just buy it without complaining".

No, when a company does something I don't like or that is a dealbreaker for me, I don't buy the product..

It’s just weird you’re so annoyed with people who do complain, especially on lemmy.

People can complain about whatever they want. What is annoying to me is when people say stuff like "the community has been requesting this for a couple years ago now so why not." or "adding a little headphone jack shouldn’t be that hard" when this debate has been settled years ago already..

Linux has ~3% market share. I guess we should just stop complaining when companies don’t support it, majority of people don’t care. Most people don’t care about privacy, they care about cheap and easy products, let’s stop complaining about Google and Meta tracking everyone.

Again, you can complain all you want. But if somebody made a post saying "Google is still using, selling and tracking user data. The community has been requesting that they stop doing that years ago, so why do they still do it? They only do it to make money. Just stop doing it, shouldn't be too hard.", it would in my opinion be a ridiculous and pointless post..

[–] ghandi9@lemmy.meg.li 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You keep making the same point

You made a claim that I wrote something I didn't write, do you expect me to just let you put words into my mouth?

You have a different standard.

The vast majority of people interested in the fairphone have "a different standard"..

But for me what Apple did was wrong.

Ok, great, you have an opinion. An opinion I can completely understand. What does it have to do with this post though?

Mini jack was not obsolete

It wasn't. But it's not 2017 anymore..

Even you admitted they only did it for profit

Of course they did, why else would they do it, they are a company.

just don't criticize people that do care.

I will criticize whoever I want because it's fucking annoying to have the self-rightous jack defenders pretend martyrers proudly proclaim that they will sacrifice themself and not buy the newest fairphone because "fairphone went against community demands" and act as if they are the majority and represent the views of "the community" IN 2023..

They don't.. Most people in the fairphone community didn't care about the jack back when it was removed.. Most members of the community preferred a slimmer phone to a headphone jack back when the last fairphone was released. And despite of this, you still had some loud-mouths who acted as if their opinions alone represent "the community", ignored all the discussion in the community and claimed that fairphone acted against community interest.

And as "a member of the fairphone community", I didn't say anything, like most who don't care about the jack, because I don't care about the jack, I care about being able to change parts, I care about it lasting for many years and I care about it being small enough to fit in my pocket comfortably.

That was years ago, back when the fairphone decided to do this. And now, the upcoming model doesn't bring it back (to the surprise of virtually nobody) and you have the same wannabe martyrers saying stuff like "just bring it back, how hard can it be, the community demands it".. No, the community doesn't demand it.. The community demands a modular and long lasting phone that is slim and cheap at the same time..

we'll do it as long as we can

Do whatever pointless posturing you want, just don't act as if you are in the majority or represent all of a community when you don't..

[–] ghandi9@lemmy.meg.li 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)

still claim that people don’t use phones for music.

But I have never claimed that "people don't use phones for music", I claimed that most people don't use their phone to listen to music on their headphones.. Many do, me included, but most simply don't..

If you ignore all the people that care about an issue you will conclude that no one cares.

But I don't conclude that nobody cares.. Obviously at least some people care, this post was made by somebody who does for example.. But the thing is that a majority of people don't..

[–] ghandi9@lemmy.meg.li 0 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Wow, that’s a bold statement.

If you think that it is a bold statement you absolutely live in a bubble..

in the sense that most people in the world don’t own a phone.

Most people in the world do own a phone.. About 75% of the global population.. It's just that most use it to access the internet, write mails or, you know, call people..

As your study says, young people do listen to music on their phones. It even surprises me a bit that they only listen to 44% of their music on their phone, but otherwise, no objection. But not every smartphone user is a young person.. And even those that do use their phone to listen to music, not all of them listen with headphones. Many use it to play music in their car, or connect it to speakers, or even use their built in speakers, etc.

I think you’re looking at yourself and thinking that everyone is using a phone the same way you do.

I used to, but the thing is, I do actually listen to music on my phone. Not as much as I used to, but I still do from time to time. And many in my immediate environment do too. But overtime, I realized that most people don't use their phone the same way I do, especially older people and non-technical savy people. Most listen to music in their car, or on the radio.

In reality people were used to just plugging their headphones into heir phone and now they can’t.

In reality, most people simply did not really care very much.. And more importantly, virtually nobody cares today..

New standard was pushed on them and the only reason was to make some extra money on AirPods.

Correct, and virtually everyone just shrugged and accepted it because most people did not care all that much..

So yeah, people will move on in the end but they are right to complain.

My dude, people have already moved on years ago... Apple removed the jack in 2017.. Which is why I think it's ridiculous that people still act as if this is a controversial issue, let alone a dealbreaker, looking towards the future..

[–] ghandi9@lemmy.meg.li -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can u name a solution for this that doesn’t involve replacing dongles constantly

No, but I don't get why anybody owes you a solution.. We are talking about smartphones here, not professional audio devices.. Most people don't care about using professional studio headsets with their smartphone, so I don't understand why you expect smartphone manufactureres bending themselves over backwards just to satisfy a small minority of people like you when that would mean that 90% of people now have a plug that they never use..

[–] ghandi9@lemmy.meg.li -1 points 1 year ago (10 children)

This is how it should be done: you introduce new, better standards, people switch and when it’s actually obsolete (no one is using it any more) you remove it.

I think there is a fair argument to be made that back when apple pushed away from it, it was forced. I personally didn't care, but I understand why some people did.

But that's not what we are talking about, we are talking about today.. What's done is done..

People were (and are) still using mini jacks

Most people weren't and certainly aren't.. The people who still cling to the jack never seem to understand this, but most smartphone users simply don't care about audio quality on their phone.. Most people don't even listen to music on their phone.. And among those who do, most don't care or even notice the loss of quality with wireless.. And for the few who care, there are alternatives, such as adapters..

And just as a reminder, we are talking about the upcoming fairphone 5, a device that has the goal of lasting 10 years.. There is no reasonable justification for putting a port on it that has by now virtually disappeared from the smartphone market and that most people would never use..

[–] ghandi9@lemmy.meg.li 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Some people will just swallow propaganda, and defend corporations even going against their own interests.

Or maybe some people just don't care about using their smartphone as a premium audio device? The audio jack on a smartphone servers no purpose to me, it hasn't for years before smartphone manufacturers started moving away from it. It's nothing more than a unused plug that can potentially break and whether you like it or not, most people nowadays have the same opinion as me..

There was a discussion to be had back when apple started to push for it, one can even argue that this was forced by apple before it's time. But we aren't talking about that, we are talking about today, about what should happen with this upcoming phone that is supposed to be functional for 10 years..

The idea that they should reintroduce a standard that has since almost completely disappeared in the smartphone world because a small minority of people want to connect professional studio headphones that are about as expensive as the smartphone itself is absolutely ridiculous..

[–] ghandi9@lemmy.meg.li -2 points 1 year ago

No, just because you say “it is obsolete” doesn’t make it so.

It's not obsolete because I say so, it's obsolete because it has no function that cannot be replaced with USB, an interface that is already present on every modern smartphone..

The headphone jack is an industry standard, has been for decades and will be for much more time

The fact that we have done something in the past or had a certain standard is not a good argument for keeping it indefinitely..

It’s not really a standard

Of course it is... Apart from the Iphone, every smartphone has an USB C interface.. Yes, it is kinda a mess with differences in quality etc, but as far as the interface goes, USB C is the standard nowadays..

Why should i have a more fragile connector that has to rely on electronics when i can use a cable that i can fix myself if it breaks?

It's already there.. Even if you have a modern smartphone that still has a 3.5mm jack, you still have to have a USB port to charge your phone, etc.. So the actual question is:

Why should a modern smartphone have an additional 3.5mm audio jack that servers no function other than audio when that function is already taken care of with USB (or wireless)? I can see an argument if we were talking about audiophile tech, but we are talking about smartphones..

Also, please point me in the directon of some high end headphones with a usb connector. And i mean high end, reference quality, not some brandless crap from amazon.

What do you mean with "high end"? "Audiophile stuff"? The focus is obviously on wireless stuff nowadays because most people don't care that much about audio quality, especially not when listening on their phones, but there are USB headphones:

https://www.androidcentral.com/best-usb-c-headphones

Because Fairphone are arguing in bad faith. If they were really concerned about repairabilty, they would have kept a reliable and easy to fix jack instead of selling overpriced bluetooth earbuds.

Why? It's just another additional port that can break.. I'm sure selling wireless earbuds played a role in their decision, they are a business after all, but that doesn't mean that it was the only factor in their decisions or that there aren't viable reasons to move away from the headphone jack..

If anything, this whole ordeal is a constant reminder that corporations are not our friends, and that some people will somehow just blindly defend them.

Of course corporations aren't our friends, they are businesses.. And you can imply that I'm "blindly defending them" if you want, just as I can claim that you are blindly clinging to an outdated standard that has by today virtually completely disappeared in the smartphone world and that there would be no benefit in bringing it back..

[–] ghandi9@lemmy.meg.li 1 points 1 year ago

First: nothing you buy will ever be free from exploitation under this system.

Ok but again, even if you think so, there are still different degrees of exploitation. Saying "nothing I buy will ever be free from exploitation" can also be used as an argument not to care about exploitation at all..

buying one product over another will make no difference in society and the world.

Of course it will.. You can argue that the difference it makes is so small that it is essentially 0, but it still makes a difference..

but they never manage to end the harmful production pattern that these companies were applying in the first place.

Just because you buying a more sustainably produced smartphone doesn't solve all the problems in the world doesn't mean that it has 0 impact..

In the end, conscious consumption only serves to feel good (falsely) about yourself.

No, it also demonstrates a way to improve something, even if that improvement is minuscule.. It also shows the potential issues and problems that come with it.. I would never claim that somebody buying a fairphone is changing the world, of course that would be ridiculous. Individual consumer choices indeed don't have a big impact on systemic issues.

view more: next ›