NonCredibleDefense

6561 readers
932 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
76
 
 
77
78
 
 
79
 
 
80
 
 
81
 
 
82
 
 

I have been marked.
r*ddit

83
 
 
84
 
 
85
 
 
86
87
 
 
88
 
 
89
90
 
 
91
 
 
92
93
 
 
94
 
 
95
 
 
96
 
 
97
 
 
98
 
 

Explanation:

Germany: Because fighting the entire royal navy with 1 battleship is definitely going to work out great.

UK: They considered anything above 25 knots to be battlecruisers, and when pushing her boilers to the max, HMS Rodney did likely get up to 25 knots. So very technically, they could be considered battlecruisers.

Merica: I will just point you to Drachinifel again.

Frnce: because of course the Frnch copied the worst design they could find.

Azure Lane: Don’t lie, you know exactly what I mean.

NCD: The design was chosen to save weight, just like a bullpup. The trigger (in the front turret) is in front of (most of) the ammo, just like a bullpup. And unlike normal battleships, there isn’t a back turret to screw everything up. Nelsons = Bullpups

r*ddit

99
 
 
100
 
 

(sound on for awesomeness)

view more: ‹ prev next ›