this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
205 points (95.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43939 readers
425 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Job: cashier

Item doesn't scan

Customer: "That means it's free, right?"

πŸ™„πŸ™„πŸ™„πŸ™„πŸ™„

Only about 4 weeks in as a cashier and I've heard this enough to last me a lifetime.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (27 children)

Really? How can a company make terrible appliances for a single country? They’re not made domestically.

[–] Slippery_Snake874@sopuli.xyz 23 points 4 months ago (10 children)

Same factory just send the units that normally wouldn't be sellable (defects and such) but still function to the US

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You say that, but my experience is different. After my Samsung washing machine failed, I took it apart and found blatant evidence of planned obsolescence. If the units elsewhere are good, then the ones in the US aren't just the same things with defects, but rather ones with spider arms cast from an entirely different metal alloy.

[–] Slippery_Snake874@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 months ago

Fair enough, I was just guessing at a way one country could receive only/mostly inferior products

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)