this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
112 points (87.3% liked)

People Twitter

5377 readers
1114 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 44 points 2 months ago (12 children)

That the exact location of where rockets land was always treated as sensitive information everywhere to make it hard for the other side to adjust their targeting? During WW2 the British government went as far as coordinate fake news about where the V2 rockets landed with the media to make it harder for the Germans to hit anything.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

A major difference here is that during WW2 the rockets were unguided and fully relied on fuel-weight calculations. These ballistic missiles are GPS guided and don't suffer from all of the unknown factors.

There is certainly a case to be made for secrecy, though it's more likely they don't want to let Iran know whether F35's, tanks or other military equipment were hit. Israel already claimed they "intercepted the majority of projectiles" but the videos don't really corroborate that. Similar to the Hamas "limited ground operation" last year israel tries to hide all evidence and then crafts their own story of what happened.

load more comments (10 replies)