this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
21 points (100.0% liked)
Asklemmy
43929 readers
872 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The necessity for an army.
I see this opinion a lot. Sincere question, how are countries without armies supposed to defend themselves from imperialism?
You can rephrase it in lighter terms as "how much is enought military funding?"
as much as can keep you more powerful than the rest of the competition combined.
Well that escalated quickly.
At least that's what I aim for in Civ VI.
No idea about you
My aim for CIV is minimal military to survive a first push but enough money to just buy military units to then push back, take all their cities and be labelled warmonger. Suddenly everyone wants a piece of this ass so i spend the rest of the game fighting... I see I have a problem in this pipeline
I don't play Civ VI and I don't rule a country so I can't speak from experience.