this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
500 points (99.4% liked)

History Ruins

606 readers
575 users here now

What is a ruin? We’re running off of “You know it when you see it” at the moment. Ruins should be non-functioning structures of some age, or their function reduced to tourism and the like.

Generally speaking, specific items from a ruin should go to !historyartifacts@lemmy.world

Illustrations of ruins (or their reconstructions) should go to !historyillustrations@lemmy.world

Photos of ruins back when they were functioning should go to !HistoryPorn@lemmy.world

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aramis87@fedia.io 9 points 17 hours ago (4 children)
[–] SomeoneSomewhere 14 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

An awfully large number of things that are now considered 'historical scenic attractions' and 'an integral part of the landscape' were originally built entirely for practical purposes with almost no consideration for aesthetics. Especially bridges and other infrastructure. See also steam trains.

But you try and build new infrastructure and everyone wants to spend 3x the cost on architectural design, screening, or tunnel it underground entirely.

[–] kmaismith@lemm.ee 9 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I beg to differ on the abject lack of aesthetic consideration. I’ve skimmed through old construction manuals and from even the surface it seems old masters of the building craft were obsessed with the blending of aesthetics and function

[–] SomeoneSomewhere 2 points 8 hours ago

Buildings yes.

I'm not so sure about infrastructure, especially things like steel girder bridges.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)