this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
279 points (91.4% liked)

Memes

45877 readers
1024 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MerrySkeptic@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 week ago (7 children)

The International Court of Justice does not just represent the West, it represents all UN countries. And while it did find evidence of human rights abuse it did not find evidence of genocide, because that is a high bar.

Furthermore, the International Association of Genocide Scholars, representing 300 genocide experts, condemned Russia's use of the term to justify its own violence, as cited here: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14623528.2022.2099633?scroll=top&needAccess=true

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Again, the intent is very clear and indisputable. The only reason it's not a full on genocide the way it is in Gaza is because Ukraine lacked the means to follow through. Meanwhile, it's funny how these same genocide experts never condemned the US for making completely unfounded genocide claims against China.

[–] random@lemmy.blahaj.zone -5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

completely unfounded genocide claims against China.

they're not completely unfounded

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Uyghurs_in_China

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] random@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

wikipedia is a summary of multiple sources, just pick one of the listed sources and complain about it

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 days ago

Ok.

Lol, Adrian Zenz as a source

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)