this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
899 points (96.9% liked)

196

16790 readers
2316 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
899
rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

Guys, at this rate I don't think the revolution's going to happen anytime soon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 14 points 3 days ago (16 children)

No, I did not assume. I read the part where you said you spent your entire life as a Democrat. That's the past tense which means you no longer are.

Nobody kicked you out. You got upset when somebody pushed back. Just like now.

What opinion of yours got challenged enough that you left? Let's hear it so we know if it's bad enough to deserve whatever you got or you were unjustly maligned.

[–] Forester@pawb.social 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

I'm not the guy you're replying to and I am interested to hear his response, but also I'd like to point out that you jumped to conclusions faster than Superman can jump over a building. But hey what do I know? I'm just a libertarian minarchist. Personally, almost all of your purity tests are repugnant from my point of view.

Maybe you should look into egotistical altruism.

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 6 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I used to be an Ayn Rand libertarian minarchist when I was a teenager. There's a bunch of reasons I disagree with it now, but the utter failure of people's butthead behavior during the pandemic is just the latest things that you'd have to completely ignore to maintain egotistical altruism is something that can be relied on in the real world. Not really interested in a discussion about it; I've had all of them long ago and I don't think we'd have anything to budge the other person.

[–] Forester@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You seem to have an entirely separate definition of what egotistical altruism means from how most other people understand the concept. In its simplest form it's just doing good unto others so they can live more productive better lives as more of their needs are met by community support.

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ok, that definition does not define how people acted during the pandemic either. Some people were even actively harming others.

[–] Forester@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Brother you seem lost I'm saying that's how people should act if they want to have a positive impact on their society

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

And I'm saying people don't act like that via the example of the pandemic. I understand the definition but think it's unrealistic to expect people to act like that. Does that make sense to you? From this end it seems like you're the lost one so I'm not quite sure how to clarify what I've said.

[–] Forester@pawb.social 1 points 21 hours ago

Be the change you want to see

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)