296
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] soc@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

“apparently it’s a better safer C++, but I’m not going to switch because I can technically do all that stuff in C++”

The main difference between C++ and D was that (for most of the time in the past) D required a garbage collector.

So, D was a language with similar Algol-style syntax targeting a completely different niche from C++.

Trying to correct your quote, it should read something like "I’m not going to switch because I can't technically do all that stuff in D that I'm doing in C++" for it to make any sense.

[-] adb@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

“Before rust you could either have a fast language (C/C++) or a memory safe language (any other language. That is, languages with garbage collector).”

Ada managed to do safe and fast over forty years ago.

[-] bitcrafter@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Does Ada have a capability as powerful as the borrow checker?

[-] BatmanAoD@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Strictly speaking, no. The borrow checker was a true innovation.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
296 points (97.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

33298 readers
378 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS