58
The fate of “small” open source
(nolanlawson.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
58 points (96.8% liked)
Opensource
6939 readers
49 users here now
A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!
⠀
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I feel like there is always more open source code to write. If not for practical reasons, then for experimental, educational or just humorous values.
Yes it's called experiential value, like an artist doing sketches, developers sketch their program. Open Source is not meant for production use. The industrial software library development should be done by professional software engineering companies in a socially responsible way.
That would maybe be nice in theory, except nobody wants to pay, so this would be both terrible and limiting in practice
Everybody wants to pay, nobody is giving them a chance to by providing sound means, trying to sell open source charity instead which the legal departments absolutely hates. It's not true that businesses don't want to pay, what they don't want is to donate. These are very different things.
there is sound means. open source business model is support.
LOL yes let's listen to a person who read a stupid opinion (im not saying you are stupid) on the internet and now propagates it everywhere he sees the "open source" keyword. If you read by comment i'm explicitly talking about software libraries, the only support you get for libraries is documentation. nobody listen to me nobody is selling support for small libraries which is what this post is about, on any meaningful level. prove me wrong