207
submitted 10 months ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/opensource@programming.dev

Six folks pledged lumps of cash to make it happen.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jqubed@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago

I am most intrigued by this concept of frustrated users crowdfunding pledges for bug bounties that bother them

[-] Kissaki@programming.dev 24 points 10 months ago

New hardware manufacturer quality metric: Number of frustrated user pledges per time since market introduction.

[-] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago

Would a lot of people wanting to use the hardware but the drivers sucking be indicative of a good company or a bad company?

[-] Tempy@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago

A bad company. Because they should be delivering a holistic product. But their hardware side knows their shit at least.

[-] Kissaki@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago

As a quality metric, "bad company". If you can differentiate between hardware product and drivers, you can separate those metrics. But usually, and for most people, using the product also means using their drivers.

load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
207 points (99.5% liked)

Opensource

6819 readers
74 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

⠀


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS