Every blog post like this contains a bunch of new variables I've never heard of but always wanted. Like help-window-keep-selected or window-combination-resize.
Putting that aside though, am I the only one who likes the built-in completions buffer?
I tend to like it, too (though I can't tell if that's just because it's what I first used and now I just expect it to work that way, now…).
Do you know if there's a way to go backwards through available options, though? I forget what shift+tab does but its not the inverse of tab and having to cycle all the way through to come back around on a particularly large list of options sure is tedious.
I think that's just about my only complaint with the default.
Not quite (though I hadn't realized, before this thread, that such an option existed); I was more thinking of tabbing in the opposite direction for minibuffer-complete.
I sort of lay out everything in the comment at https://midwest.social/comment/24082938 but the short of it is that I realized that minibuffer-completedoes have functionality already built it: it just doesn't seem to work when trying to to autocompletion in Eval:. So I didn't realize that it'd work in circumstances like M-x.
Thanks so much for the suggestion, though! 'Appreciate the help.
Every blog post like this contains a bunch of new variables I've never heard of but always wanted. Like
help-window-keep-selectedorwindow-combination-resize.Putting that aside though, am I the only one who likes the built-in completions buffer?
I like that it doesn't move the modeline up for completion and that it feels like shell completion. It also works for completion at-point.
The variable
completion-auto-selectis load bearing for my workflow though, before I knew about it I very much thought I needed icomplete or vertico.I tend to like it, too (though I can't tell if that's just because it's what I first used and now I just expect it to work that way, now…).
Do you know if there's a way to go backwards through available options, though? I forget what
shift+tabdoes but its not the inverse oftaband having to cycle all the way through to come back around on a particularly large list of options sure is tedious.I think that's just about my only complaint with the default.
Maybe M-p?
Not quite (though I hadn't realized, before this thread, that such an option existed); I was more thinking of tabbing in the opposite direction for
minibuffer-complete.I sort of lay out everything in the comment at https://midwest.social/comment/24082938 but the short of it is that I realized that
minibuffer-completedoes have functionality already built it: it just doesn't seem to work when trying to to autocompletion inEval:. So I didn't realize that it'd work in circumstances likeM-x.Thanks so much for the suggestion, though! 'Appreciate the help.