96
Wall Street Wants to Change the Rules for Your 401(k). It Could Put Your Retirement at Risk.
(www.propublica.org)
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
96 points (99.0% liked)
Personal Finance
5689 readers
21 users here now
Learn about budgeting, saving, getting out of debt, credit, investing, and retirement planning. Join our community, read the PF Wiki, and get on top of your finances!
Note: This community is not region centric, so if you are posting anything specific to a certain region, kindly specify that in the title (something like [USA], [EU], [AUS] etc.)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
TL;DR - They want to allow riskier and more expensive investments into 401(k) accounts.
Many 401(k) options can be pretty crappy as it is now, and as boring as it can be, we need to ensure we understand what we're signing up for if we don't expect to be screwed, just as in any other financial situation. Learn the basics of investment saving, set up your own brokerage account, and do a regular sweep of your funds into your personal low fee account as frequently as your employer plan lets you.
Yes, it sucks that they are attempting to remove guardrails, but this shouldn't be anything new for anyone with a retirement account. If you don't understand what you are investing in, you've already likely failed yourself. Everyone should at minimum be able to understand the terms of your 401(k) policy, know what different asset classes are, and know what expense ratios are. Getting informed keeps us safe. Trusting an employer or financial product salesman is not the way to go.
For anyone wanting to start on basics, from simple to more involved:
Short 15 page starter guide
Bogleheads Wiki
Bogleheads' Guide to Investing
Yeah, they're not "doing" anything to our 401(k)s. Allowing riskier funds to be added and reducing the liability for the people offering those funds is scummy but if someone can't be bothered to inform themselves my sympathy is limited. When you start a new plan you get about half a tree's worth of prospectuses, and they are also available online. If you can't be bothered to learn, just dump it into an index tracker or one of those age based ones that slowly transitions from stocks to bonds as you age. If you put a significant amount of money into some risky get-rich-quick scheme: I'm not going to say you deserve it, but I'm not interested in hearing you cry about it.
My plan added a lot of funds a couple years ago. When I was first informed about it I was very interested to see what would be available because up to that point it was very vanilla and some of it sounded like it might work for me. It took about 30 seconds to scan the fees on these new funds for me to laugh and know they were all crap. I still read the rest of it and even aside from the fees they were all junk at best and designed to create a bunch of bag-holders at worst. It's not forced and it's not hidden. Be informed and/or just keep it simple and this won't affect you.
When do worship services end, when the singing starts or whenever you're done with the holier-than-thou, limited sympathy shtick for every man, woman, and child not taking the time out of their attention starved lives to read every 500 page thick prospectus? What about every Form 10-K? Let's just grind the whole dang world to a halt so that everyone can be forced to read all the EULAs, terms of service, company handbooks, and warranty terms for every single thing that touches our lives. "You're a citizen of this city in this state in this country? Ok recite every single ordinance and law of each from memory bro." Most Christians haven't even read the whole Bible, are they still Christians? Are they still called Christians? What about the Bhagavad Gita, did you make sure everyone who offers incense at a shrine has read the entire thing? Do you even speak English if you can't recite the entirety of Chaucer's "Canterbury Tales?" Let's calm tf down. Professional investors don't even read the prospectus. If you want to give ppl the limited-sympathy, r/iamverysmart treatment then mandatory voting would be a more productive place to start but even that has some serious issues too. Isn't there enough suffering and injustice in the world that we don't have to look for reasons to justify misfortune when it happens to others with petty "well if they can't inform themselves I can't be bothered to have sympathy for my fellow human beings" statements?
Given your reading comprehension I would not recommend you read the prospectus.
Like I said, if you can't/won't inform yourself just play it safe with index trackers and age based funds. If you can't/won't inform yourself and still decide to invest in risky high-fee funds, you share at least some of the blame with the people who offered you those funds.