587
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Vosh@programming.dev to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 1 month ago

IMHO: XML is superior as a document storage format. JSON is superior as a data transfer format.

[-] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml -5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

XML is not really superior to JSON as an image editing file format. EDIT: XML is better, if you want to keep a readable source format with markup. But that is not what a format for an image editing tool like GIMP should be needed for in my opinion.

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 month ago

No, they are both not really suitable for that. But I don't see where the link in the OP implies they plan to store binary image data in XML, they're probably going to store that in a binary format and use XML to describe relationships and other metadata.

[-] CmykStudent@fosstodon.org 7 points 1 month ago

@schnurrito @thingsiplay Yes, the XML is for file structure descriptions not binary data.

The GEGL buffers we use for image data in GIMP can be synced across files, so this new format will allow us to quickly auto-save the image/layer/etc to file as you make edits. Still in-progress work, but it's really cool.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
587 points (99.0% liked)

Open Source

49210 readers
190 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS