this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
460 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

59607 readers
3432 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 266 points 1 year ago (94 children)

Blows my mind that anyone still uses WinRAR when 7zip exists.

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (20 children)

FUCK WINRAR!

it's so stupid and amazing this recent celebration of people that are proud to have paid for it.

It was never a good solution really..

It just worked for what it was for a time... Because it was better than WinZip or pkzip.

7-zip has been amazing for years..

Better OS support would be cool too but it's so unnecessary thanks to 7zip.

[–] InvaderDJ@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (9 children)

WinRAR was great for the time and their policies on paying for the program were extremely generous. Time just overtook it.

It's essentially just shareware.

More specifically, it's nagware which wasn't particularly uncommon for the time WinRAR was introduced so I don't know that it's particularly generous really when one considers all the other nagware that came out in the late 90s.

It's just one of many different licensing strategies.

In this case it seems to have paid off for the developer as it appears to have resulted in a great deal of fondness and goodwill among a certain portion of the user base.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (91 replies)