this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
59 points (61.6% liked)

Technology

34975 readers
134 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pgetsos@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

My only issue with Spotify Wrapped is just how inaccurate it ALWAYS is, comparing it to my Last.fm account

[–] thalamus_reborn@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

i checked my stats.fm top 2023 artists vs wrapped, and i'm seeing the same inaccuracies that you mention. my wrapped artists were:

  • Artist A
  • Artist B
  • Artist C
  • Artist D
  • Artist E (not on top 5 on stats.fm)

while on stats.fm, it shows:

  • Artist A
  • Artist D
  • Artist B
  • Artist F (not on top 5 for wrapped)
  • Artist C
  • Artist E

i think that spotify is definitely strategic with placing certain artists in certain positions. for example, "Artist F" probably was in top 5 last year as well (and is a successful but less-well-known artist), but went unlisted on wrapped this year and was replaced by Artist C, a global top 200 artist. and it worked - i had not listened to Artist C in a while, and when i saw my wrapped results, i started listening to them again.

load more comments (1 replies)