this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
2073 points (97.4% liked)

Fediverse

17636 readers
55 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The best part of the fediverse is that anyone can run their own server. The downside of this is that anyone can easily create hordes of fake accounts, as I will now demonstrate.

Fighting fake accounts is hard and most implementations do not currently have an effective way of filtering out fake accounts. I'm sure that the developers will step in if this becomes a bigger problem. Until then, remember that votes are just a number.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WheeGeetheCat@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (12 children)

when you say import tax do you mean actual monetary payment? Or a computing power tax? I don't think I understand

[–] Taako_Tuesday@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago (11 children)

I was reading it as lowering the value of an upvote from instances that are known to harbor click farming accounts. I could be wrong though.

[–] lemming007@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

That defeats the purpose of decentralization and creates a dangerous precedent. The entire point of Lemmy is that every instance is equally valid and legitimate. If certain instances are elevated above others, we're on our way to do what Gmail and Microsoft did to email.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, I didn't mean instances treated unequally in the grand, set-in-protocol scheme of the fediverse - as if some centralised authority/agreement that this instance counts for more than that. Just as defederation doesn't make meta's instance authoritatively illigitimate.

But an instance can choose, within that instance, to defederate with another; likewise an instance within itself could deprioritise some or all others' instances' votes.

Still agree dangerous precedent ...but still wonder if some sort of instance-controlled moderation of external content is eventually necessary in the future. Or, I suppose, there could be separate services (much like ad-block lists) that users individually could enable to auto-moderate/adjust their own feeds.

And (sorry for waffling!) I suppose it depends a lot on how much you browse specific communities and how much you scroll "all" or whatever. Back in the before-days, I'm used to subbing to very few communities, and generally lazily browsing r/all

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Out of interest, within a community (that's what a sublemmy is called, right?) is there any facility to prioritise votes of people subscribed to that community over those not subscribed? Was that the thing with brigading before (sorry, didn't realise this before!) that mods can moderate and ban posts/posters but not votes/voters?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)