this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
939 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

58706 readers
5057 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Should just use Linux, tbh.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thequantumcog@lemmy.world 54 points 6 months ago (25 children)

You notice it on old hardware. On my Latitude e6220 (i3 2nd gen) there is a night and day performance difference between windows 10 and Linux.

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (17 children)

As someone with Ivy Bridge hardware that has run Windows 10 and Ubuntu... I haven't.

[–] thequantumcog@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (12 children)

I use artix Linux with hyprland WM. System uses 384mb of ram on idle.

Edit: Even with extreme debloat you can't get this performance on windows.

[–] Wurzelfurz@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I'm sorry but low RAM usage is not good performance, those are not the same.

Also, I've read somewhere that all memory not in use is wasted memory. I find that thought really interesting. If an operating system would be able to always maximize RAM usage by loading every peace of software and information it uses or is about to use without using swap or a pagefile it shoud be more responsive I think.

[–] thequantumcog@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yes, you are right. But windows load programs Into ram that I don't even want to use.

In addition to less ram usage thee is also less CPU usage and faster boot time (with HDD).

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

linux is caching a lot, if there's enough RAM. you can see it in the output of the "free" command.

however, nothing stops you from moving all the stuff you frequently use to a ramdisk. it's just uncomfortable copying it over and refreshing it as updates come in. also you may want to persist some files.

personally i have my shader caches on a ramdisk on some of my boxes. the gains are minimal.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

however, nothing stops you from moving all the stuff you frequently use to a ramdisk.

mount /dev/vg-ssd/lv-usr /usr

But do it during install or you have to go behind and remove the eclipsed install stuff after.

And don't do it on systemd-afflicted systems as lennart's cancer makes that harder because he couldn't figure out why a /usr directory was useful and he ditched it. Dunning-kruger says what?

[–] anlumo@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

/usr was introduced because the original UNIX machine ran out of storage space and they had to mount a second drive.

[–] steersman2484@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago

I just memeory leak and gain infinite performance /s

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)