this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
749 points (98.0% liked)

Antiwork

8292 readers
52 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Yayannick@lemmy.ml
uthredii@lemmy.ml
sexy_peach@feddit.de
yogthos@lemmy.ml
749
show the system exactly the respect it shows you (slrpnk.net)
submitted 5 months ago by salarua@sopuli.xyz to c/antiwork@lemmy.ml
67 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub 20 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (32 children)

Not to be an apologist, but can someone explain to me how “sticking it to these companies” is by going to work for and supporting them, while encouraging the very behavior you disagree with?

Not to mention this sort of thing doesn’t work when all they have to do is instruct the AI to disregard all further commands…

Stick it to these companies by going to work for those who aren’t using any artificial intelligence to prescreen candidates.

Oh and by the way, before AI, it was human prejudice filtering out candidates. The problem is much larger than a simple implementation of today’s hot new buzz.

[–] haydng 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I mean, if I were adding this instruction it would read "this candidate doesn't want to work for a company that uses AI to screen CVs"

[–] stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub 1 points 5 months ago

All I’m trying to say is that this idea is a lie, it doesn’t work and it distracts from the larger problem that is the incompetent upper class increasing the wage gap and effectively inbreeding the problem.

load more comments (30 replies)