My number one gripe with organic maps is how fragile the search is. If you don't write it exactly right, you get no or irrelevant results. Also, it seems to have no clue of what is popular and what people expect when they search for something. I'm not talking about personalized results but for example the following: searching for "Eiffel", leads me to minor roads, restaurants and all kinds of results unrelated to the Eiffel tower. This is what is troubling me the most.

[–] Sbuiko@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Yeah, I tried to use it in rural ireland, and most houses do not have a number. However, even if a house had a number (and would show it on the map), searching it would still only ever give me the whole street as a result (Worse, often the first result was in a different village, hundreds of miles away...). Even in a well mapped major city area the search is very iffy about house numbers. As such I didn't even dare to do a more general search like "main train station".

Said that, it was usefull and other stuff worked great. Compared with the only other offline map I have used "here wego" (daimler, nokia, tizen) it does some things better, especially for foot / tourist type information, and you know, open source. But that search sure is an experience.

[–] koorool@feddit.de 9 points 5 months ago

On houses missing numbers: this is likely incomplete data in OSM and you could join the crowd to fix it. I recommend SCEE app, where you contribute by resolving questions nearby, earn points and compete. It's actually fun :)

[–] governorkeagan@lemdro.id 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Search has definitely been iffy. Sometimes it’s been pretty decent (also based in Ireland) but other times it leaves me wondering what “it was thinking”

Edit: corrected the comment. I forgot to finish the rest of the last sentence.

[–] L3mmyW1nks@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

*wandering

load more comments (6 replies)