441

Donald Trump has described at length the dangerous and disturbing actions he says he will take if he wins the presidency.

His rallies offer a steady stream of such promises and threats — things like prosecuting political opponents and using the military against U.S. citizens. These statements are so outrageous and outlandish, so openly in conflict with the norms and values of American democracy that many find them hard to regard as anything but empty bluster.

We have two words for American voters: Believe him.

MBFC
Archive

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 30 points 2 years ago

You know what I would do if I was president?

Curl up under the desk in the oval office and cry because I have no idea how to run a country.

[-] shani66@ani.social 8 points 2 years ago

You'd be doing better than some past presidents at least

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 2 years ago

Wasn't there one that died, like, a week into office because he was too cool to see a doctor or something dumb like that?

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Nah, he saw a doctor, but because it was 1841 the treatment for his flu/pneumonia/septic shock from the White House having tainted water was: bloodletting, forced vomiting, opium, laudanum, and brandy.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

If I was President I’d be taking so much anxiety medication and sobbing regularly over how difficult it is to do it ethically and to create lasting improvements to the country while everyone demands my soul in exchange for their vote in favor of necessary changes to our society, especially of the environmental sort.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Absolutely everyone believes him. The people that say that he means something other than what he's saying believe him but don't want to be stuck with the image that they're okay with it.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 10 points 2 years ago

Imagine having to even respond to that....

"Yeah he means it and I'm voting for all that shit!"

Or

"He doesn't mean that, he just lies to us to get our votes and I'm voting for him!"

Either way you're a fucking moron... Those dumb fucking people are going to set us back so much further than we already have been...

[-] acid_falcon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

That's very not true. And it's honestly scarier. I work about ten minutes from Trump's first assassination attempt.

My boss is a good Christian who didn't know that fascism is a far right ideology.

They're in their own echo chamber, just like we are. They just don't understand that their echo chamber leads to a Hitler 2.0.

[-] acid_falcon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

And to clarify to you specifically and the three-ish people that upvoted me, on a weekly basis he helps a 40 year old dude with multiple sclerosis do history homework, and they were covering the second world war. He read the Wikipedia of fascism, and he literally said that he had no idea it was a right wing ideology.

What can I glean from that? I have no fucking clue. Fuck Nazis, fuck republicans. I can only hope that there is a large group of people voting conservative who dont understand the consequence of this next election. Because if you're right than like 40% of the country are bigots, and even if the Democrats win, we're *still fast tracking to collapse

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

You can always take solace that you weren't down voted.

When you're talking about a set as large as 40 to 50% of the US there will always be exceptions. This exceptions will be numerous yet statistically and significant.

When someone says absolutely every one of the US is X, it's almost always going to be a representation of the truth rather than the actual truth.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 years ago
[-] sirboozebum@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The New York Times downplayed his racist, sexist and violent rhetoric and doing "both sides" shit for the last 8 years (the best word I have heard to describe this is "sanewashing")... and now they are coming out with this?

Fuck the New York Times.

[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago

Let's be honest. There is litterally no situation where you should ever believe a thing trump says.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago

Media Bias/Fact Check - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Media Bias/Fact Check:

Wiki: unreliable - There is consensus that Media Bias/Fact Check is generally unreliable, as it is self-published. Editors have questioned the methodology of the site's ratings.


MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - United States of America


The New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The New York Times:

Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The New York Times is generally reliable. WP:RSOPINION should be used to evaluate opinion columns, while WP:NEWSBLOG should be used for the blogs on The New York Times's website. The 2018 RfC cites WP:MEDPOP to establish that popular press sources such as The New York Times should generally not be used to support medical claims.


MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-times/
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/10/25/opinion/what-trump-says.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[-] Nelots@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High

I find this very funny. Can we get an Obama awarding himself meme in here?

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago

Especially with the context from the wiki saying the opposite lol

[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

Well thats confusingly transparant.

this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
441 points (99.1% liked)

politics

31197 readers
1553 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS