An Anarchist FAQ Reading Group - Section C.3 - Week #18 (lemmy.nz)

submitted 9 months ago by BlastboomStrice@mander.xyz to c/anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hey y'all! Here we are reading and discussing Section C.3 of AFAQ this week, which is about what determines the distribution between labour and capital!

Happy reading!

Section C.3: https://anarchistfaq.org/afaq/sectionC.html#secc3

There is also an EPUB version of AFAQ, courtesy of @irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com: here

If you'd like to join, please comment and we'll ping you next post.

Link to last week's read: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/57667336

PS. Feedback request: How did you find last week's reading pace? Fast/Slow/OK/etc.?

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top new old

[-] BlastboomStrice@mander.xyz 4 points 9 months ago

Pings:

@_cryptagion@anarchist.nexus @A_cook_not_a_chef@lemmy.world @Aatube@kbin.melroy.org @Agosagror@lemmy.dbzer0.com @altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com @alzymologist@sopuli.xyz @Amputret@lemmy.dbzer0.com @AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com @anarchotoothbrushist@lemmy.ml @BlastboomStrice@mander.xyz @ColdSideOfYourPillow@anarchist.nexus @curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com @f@quokk.au @fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net @FundMECFS@lemmy.dbzer0.com @irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com @jadedwench@lemmy.dbzer0.com @JustJack23@slrpnk.net @kennedy@lemmy.dbzer0.com @khaleer@sopuli.xyz @Lucid5603@lemmy.dbzer0.com @Nakoichi@hexbear.net @nsrxn@scribe.disroot.org @nylo@lemmy.dbzer0.com @PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org @stepan@lemmy.cafe @underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com @webghost0101@sopuli.xyz @Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus @xiwi@lemmy.dbzer0.com @y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com @zloubida@sh.itjust.works

[-] stepan@lemmy.cafe 4 points 9 months ago

Hi, I thought I would catch up, but it doesn't seem like it, so remove me from the pings please. I've had a lot going on and while I really plan to read the book, it will have to wait some time :(

[-] BlastboomStrice@mander.xyz 4 points 9 months ago

Aww it's oke, thank you for taking part in this, see ya another time:)

[-] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 months ago

If the wages of workers were related to their productivity, as argued by neo-classical economics, you would expect wages to increase as productivity rose, rather than fall. However, if wages are related to economic power, then this fall is to be expected

this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2025

25 points (100.0% liked)

Anarchism

3314 readers

11 users here now

Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.

Other anarchist comms

Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

Banner by @Val@anarchist.nexus

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com