388
Yea but we already know that's what they're gonna do regardless of what anyone says.
Just like we already know things are eventually going to get bad enough that killing the epstien-billionare class becomes both moral and necessary.
i would argue that it is already the moral choice. they are killing the planet
How can we know either way without speaking freely about it? I think this is an important conversation we should all participate in. (Fully agree with you btw)
we are talking about it right now :) that means we arent the only ones.
I can feel the class consciousness forming. Can you feel it?
Yea but we already know that’s what they’re gonna do
We can change who "they" are though, and this is our best chance since FDR.
It's not enough to have a progressive president, we need a progressive Congress behind them. But we absolutely can refuse to bail AI bris out and strip the rest of the oligarchs of their wealth.
People acting like we can't just depresses turnout.
Republicans won't, neoliberals won't, but if you act like those are the only two options...
You're just fucking wrong
I do think you're a bit naive about it, though. They won't let this happen with just a simple vote. They will defend their positions of power with violence.
load more comments
(6 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
The more this gets stated and reinforced, the more likely that people will wake up, stop investing in slop and liquidate their existing investments.
We shot one corrupt CEO and for a whole glorious month Americans almost had healthcare.
There's no industry the US government won't bail out, because the US government is corporate sponsored.
We bail out banks.
We bail out farmers.
We bail out military contractors.
... and on and on and on.
Because they "donate" to bOtH pArTiEs, and they expect a return. They don't do this out of charity.
I think it's worth adding that those companies intentionally run shit into the ground, taking the global economy with them, because they know the gov will ball them out.
Aha! the solution is for citizens to become industry. Then they can bail us out.
tHaT's EvIL sOsHuLiSm!
load more comments
(1 replies)
Bailing is the agricultural process of cutting, drying, gathering, compressing and tying up of forage crops into compact, manageable bundles for easy storage and transport.
Therefore, I am all for bailing the CEO's out of AI companies. We can all lend a hand in cutting them down, drying them, gathering them, tying them up and compressing them into manageable bundles for easy storage or... whatever... toss them into a volcano?
cutting them down, drying them, gathering them, tying them up and compressing them into manageable bundles
Sounds like a recipe for jerky. Eat the rich.
Artisanal hand-crafted AI billionaire jerky.
Baling*
Didn't the House denounce Socialism in ALL FORMS earlier this week? Therefore bailouts are no longer possible, right?
Oh, I forgot the rules don't apply to rich people. Silly me.
Socialism wouldn't just bail out an industry.
They forced this nation to take massive risks for their personal benefit. These people should be in prison and their companies and assets seized.
The world tbh
That’s not how our system works.
Socialism for the rich, bootstraps for the rest.
to be fair, we should not bail out ANY industry. if you fail at capitalism so bad you need a bailout- tough shit.
Bailout people, not companies
I feel like that depends on the industry and context. For example if say most of a specific industry is based in one or two areas and gets devastated by a natural disaster then fine. But if it's just economic failure then they should be taken private with either the states or the feds getting controlling shares.
state control is actually “public” or “nationalized” right? - not to be confused with “publicly traded” which is not the same as “the public runs the business” (as it would if a state ran it, being comprised of the public)
Yeah every bailout should mean public ownership. It's the taxpayers buying the company.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Socialism is TERRIBLE! That's why ONLY Rich people get to Partake in It!
Uhh.... billionaires asking for bailouts is peak failed capitalism.
First time through bailouts and economic crash?
load more comments
(4 replies)
Too late. It's already baked in through the insurance industry reinsurance mechanisms.
And in all your index funds, retirement funds, etc.
load more comments
(1 replies)
The worst part is that any bail out would only be enough funding for a few months with the rate they are burning money at compared to their CURRENT revenue.
Bwahaha. Taxpayers will definitely bail out this industry, especially if the crash happens during this administration. That will be true whether or not be force some level of public ownership to reap any rewards that might accrue.
You can't get skynet without giving all the taxpayer money to skynet. You don't have to call it a bailout. Just give them all our money for tokens so they don't need a bailout.
Too bad, they already figured out a way to make it happen.
they've already made some of these companies publicly traded or somewhat public by linking it with publicly traded companies so it could tap into the "most safe investment" aka index funds and now they're tapping it onto peoples taxes? smh
Bad news: we will be.
Some people are looking forward to the crash because they think these oligarchs are going to have some kind of comeuppance. To that I say: lolololol
load more comments
(1 replies)
Americans don’t care.
They’ll roll over and do nothing.
Watch.
load more comments
(9 replies)
Those taxpayers will bail these executives out and they’ll shut up about it.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2026
388 points (99.0% liked)
politics
31495 readers
2375 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS