this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
95 points (95.2% liked)

Gaming

20057 readers
31 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've had this question looking at the Quake con sale, and Call of Cthulhu Dark Corners of the Earth is for sale on both platforms. I ended up buying it on GOG. What is your opinion?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 68 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Steam, but only because 95% of my library is on there. However, I think often GOG is probably the better choice.

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago

This. I love GoG for what they do and their whole ethos, but I have damn near my entire collection already on Steam and like to condense as much as I can as hard as that may be. Steam is still by and far the best launcher, but every year GoG Galaxy gets a little bit closer to being an actual contender; literally all the rest are absolutely terrible dumpster fires.

Why is that by the way? On my PC I have Amazon, Battle.net, EA, Epic, GoG Galaxy 2.0, Itchio, Rockstar, and Uplay clients (along with some individual game launchers) and not a single one comes close to being as feature rich, streamlined, and just clearly built for the customer/player as Steam is. I know Valve has a lot more experience under their belt but it feels like the others aren't even trying. Most of them are just in your face about their store fronts and barely function as a library after the fact.

[–] worfamerryman@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago

Steam as it’s more straightforward to running it on Linux.

I bought cyberpunk on gog and it’s just a bit more work to get it installed and running.

If possible, I’d exchange it for a steam copy.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Used to be GOG for DRM free games, now it's Steam because of Linux support and the Steam Deck

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 2 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Used to be GoG but now Steam. I run Linux so it's nice to have a client that makes that easy rather than having to rely on a 3rd party one.

[–] Platform27@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Check out Heroic Game Launcher. It works with GoG, handles GoG Galaxy Cloud Save support, and works with Proton (similar to Steam). A very good client.

[–] exu@feditown.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As someone also using Linux, Steam has an official client, the workshop and is continuously advancing gaming on Linux. While GOG promised a native client years ago they haven't delivered and Heroic has much fewer features than Steam.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, heroic is amazing and I really appreciate the amount of work that's gone into it. It's still much more convenient to buy direct from Steam and it rewards the company for the efforts to push gaming on Linux forward.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

GOG. I like actually owning the games I buy

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ampersandrew@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm on Linux, so if I buy from GOG, I don't get cloud saves or automatic updates. If we had Galaxy on Linux, it would be my default store. But it's not on Linux, so I shop on Steam.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EthanolParty@lemmy.sdf.org 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

When I used Windows I mainly bought on Gog for the DRM-free aspect. Now that I've switched to Linux almost completely, I find Steam's software for running Windows games on Linux to be just about the most seamless and easy to use, compared to other stuff I've tried like Lutris and Heroic Games Launcher.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same story here. I thought Linux support would be right in line with GoG's philosophy but their stance has been understandable but a bit disappointing. Valve makes it easy for me so they get my money.

[–] exu@feditown.com 4 points 1 year ago

They did actually promise a native Linux client years ago. Seems they stopped caring at some point though.

[–] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Steam, because I would want to support the company that respects linux users.

[–] AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

GOG also offers Linux versions of any games that have such a version.

[–] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

You're right, but I think OP meant almost all the games that are developed by Valve have a Linux version, meanwhile non of the games developed by CDPR has it.

[–] RickyWars@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago

Always GOG. While I've loved Steam for years and still do, I'd rather have a stronger ownership over my games.

[–] nugget359@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Steam but mainly because I have a steam deck so ease of use.

[–] Still@programming.dev 15 points 1 year ago

I'd go steam, they games probably drm free on both and steam has a Linux client and cloud saves and workshop

[–] Animortis@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Steam. I need higher Linux compatibility.

[–] nutlink@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

GOG. DRM-free support needs all the help it can get. I have nothing but respect for Steam, so it's my secondary choice. The only exception is if it's a game that's been out for a while and there's been discrepancies between GOG and Steam support (or a dev/publisher with a history of said issues), in which case I'll go with the one that's better supported.

[–] uninvitedguest@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

Steam for a few reasons:

  1. Ease of use with the Steam deck
  2. Prices are often cheaper, albeit often through sites like Fanatical/ Humble
  3. Synergizes with my only subscription, Humble Choice
  4. There is a lot of content missing from games on GOG compared to Steam. Most of it is trivial, but sometimes it is substantial. It has created a rhetoric about GOG customers being treated as second class citizens. Google Sheets

I used to try to buy my games at GOG where there wasn't a significant financial difference. I liked what they were doing, especially with GOG Galaxy at the time. The pendulum swung back to Steam over time, and now I'm just not buying games any more.

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I've learned my lesson to never buy again from any other than Steam.

Every other launcher except GOG Galaxy are pure trash. And about a year ago I switched to Linux, so now I only buy from Steam. They make gaming better for everyone, they know it's a win-win situation.

[–] mrbubblesort@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly I'm so lazy and deep into the ecosystem now if if it's not on Steam I just won't play it. There's too many things to play, and I don't care enough to bother with multiple launchers and accounts

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

GoG if possible. I'm very slowly trying to buh more from GoG as insurance from the eventual enshitification that I sadly know Steam will fall prey to.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Poggervania@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

Usually GOG, but now that I’m slowly switching to Linux and finding out how hard it is to run some games from GOG, I’m looking to move back onto Steam for games I want on my Linux laptop.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago

I would 100% be buying things on GOG whenever possible -- if they had a Linux client.

Because they don't, the convenience of Steam and Proton integration generally offsets concerns I have about losing access to things if Steam ever goes under. It's a tradeoff.

[–] DreamySweet@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

GOG because it's more convenient and less ableist.

Steam's colour scheme makes it difficult to read and causes eye strain and headaches for people with astigmatism, like me. The way the light text bleeds into the darkness surrounding it makes it difficult to read anything so I can't be sure of the price that I'm paying without copy/pasting it into notepad or something. When I made a thread pointing this out years ago, when they disabled the old theme system, Valve's mods banned me from the forum and deleted my thread.

I sent an email to Epic Games about the same problem in their store and got a response that could be summarized as "Don't care, go fuck yourself." so they are not a good option either. I don't like gambling so I won't use EA's virtual casino, and I want to keep the games I buy so Ubisoft's store is also not an option.

It's GOG or piracy for me.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Steam’s colour scheme makes it difficult to read and causes eye strain and headaches for people with astigmatism, like me.

The Steam Store is just a website where a user style such as https://uso.kkx.one/style/219929 can be applied like any other. Game prices are just black on white using that theme:

The Steam Client itself is largely or perhaps even fully controllable via command line (https://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Command_line_options#Steam) and you can set any color scheme to your terminal as you like:

The Steam Client also supports skins since forever: https://steamcustomizer.com/

Steam may not have color schemes for all kinds of visual impairments and that's a legitimate criticism but Steam has a bag full of aforementioned features for customization, so with a little bit of research (I was curious about that myself, so I spent like 5 to 10 minutes) I found quite easy workarounds. As someone who does not like to be blasted in the face with light themes, I look for similar workarounds all the time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] featherfurl@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

At the moment I pretty much only buy games on Steam. GoG has been pretty hostile to Linux over the years, whereas Valve is the only gaming focused company that robustly supports Linux on both a hardware and software level. The money I give to their platform directly supports Linux gaming and everyone directly benefits from this.

Valve is also an exceptionally rare example of a privately owned, not publicly traded company of their size. Gabe Newell himself owns a majority stake and has shown that he is more interested in running a company that can make effective long term decisions than a company that desperately suckles at the teats of short term profits and corporatocracy. As long as this stays true, Valve is in a vastly better position to resist enshittification than most big tech companies out there. Valve doesn't need to pull a Red Hat unless fundamental things change, and Gabe seems pretty happy to be in a position where he doesn't need another layer of corporate overlords.

I'd definitely prefer to have DRM free stuff, but Steam is a pretty good compromise at the moment. If Valve ever goes to shit, I'll just take steps to access the games I own in a way that is independently well supported on Linux. I suspect there will be multiple ways to do so if it ever comes to this. Proton being open source counts for a lot.

[–] BitSound@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I also go GOG first. I like the whole DRM-free aspect.

[–] ghostworm24@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

GOG for DRM-free, unless there is a benefit to Steam. For example, Spelunky gets a daily challenge only on Steam.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago

If I'm getting it on one of those platforms, it's to play it on my Steam Deck and it's more native to do it in Steam.

[–] yozul@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

Steam. It's better on Linux, and GOG isn't always DRM free anymore. Also, although most games do, Steam games don't actually have to use any DRM.

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

GOG for drm free. I'm always gutted when I buy on steam, but forget to check GOG and it's there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

GOG, because if you don't use GOG Galaxy (and you can as is not at all required and ALL games have offline installers) you never fire up a game and have to wait for Steam to update or are on vacations running it on a notebook with mobile paid data, forget to disable "cloud saves" or some stupid shit like that and run out of data.

Also GOG is 100% DRM free.

Oh, and did you know that Steam is about to switch off Windows 7 support?!

Why should games that work perfectly in older computers with Windows 7, bought and paid for because of supporting it, stop working because Valve wants to keep on controlling your usage of games you bought but doesn't want to spend money for even a basic launch clienf supporting that OS?

There is no such problem with GOG and there will never be if you download the offline installers for your games - as long as the machine works, the games will work, period.

Oh, and GOG goes out of their way yo support old games: it's in their name Good Old Games.

GOG is freedom, Steam is a golden chain.

[–] Twink@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

If GOG develops their own Linux client I might swap. Until then I'll be on Steam.

[–] root@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Depends on thw game and what sort of mod support it has. Obviously on Steam if it has Steam workshop support. DRM free on GOG is good but at the same time Steam has been doing quite of lot of good things related to gaming on Linux and I would like them to continue doing it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SootyChimney@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

I've got to say, Steam's native Wine/Proton implementation works decently well, and really entices me to buy games without native Linux support on Steam.

[–] CoconutKnight@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Steam, because Valve guarantees to keep games playable even if they go out of business. Aaand I keep forgetting that GOG exists xD

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Considering pretty much all the legally obtained digital download games I have on PC come from Steam, I think it's safe to assume I'll just get the game I want from Steam.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] learningduck@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

If the price are equal then GOG, but it doesn't has local price and tend to be significantly more expensive than games on Steam.

[–] whiskeypickle@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Steam because GOG does something to their games that makes most mods not work on them.

Gotta have my mods!

[–] ram@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

GOG. I don't like steam so I try to avoid it where there's not a large price difference.

[–] GenericBob@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›