this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
772 points (95.8% liked)

politics

19150 readers
2188 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

They broke it out as 53% wouldn't support him if he's the GOP nominee, and another 11% wouldn't support him in November 2024.

...what's the difference between those two things?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jesterraiin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I recall the polls by mainstream media saying that Trump stands no chance just before he became POTUS.

[–] TheWoozy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

538.com gave him a 25% chance of winning. His win was a horrible shock, but it shouldn't have been a surprise.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Polls are pointless. Haven’t we learned anything for this nonsense?

[–] downpunxx@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While this is very heartening to read, here's some fun American political numbers games for you :

Population of North Dakota: 780 Thousand souls
Population of California: 40 Million souls

both North Dakota and California are entitled to exactly 2 Senators each to represent their interests equally

As we've seen in plenty of Presidential elections since 2000 it matter where the votes are cast, and in what concentration, opposed to how many overall votes got towards any particular Presidential candidate

[–] WagesOf@artemis.camp 3 points 1 year ago

Research the bullshit the oligarchy pulled to get ND to be made a state. They had to rewrite a shit load of laws and ended up with, I think, 10 new senators rather than the two they should have gotten for the Dakota territory.

That fuckery is still all the way up our ass to this day.

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Does not matter. Those remaining 36% are located in strategic places to make up for majority of the land mass - aka electoral college - to bring back Cheeto

[–] Niggling__Niggard@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

How many of them actually vote?

[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Now subtract the people who claim they wouldn't support Trump from that number and you're back around 2016 numbers.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›