-edited for results- NSFW Content is now fully permitted BUT it must be tagged. Any NSFW content that has not been tagged and blurred will be removed. Content warnings should also be added to the title in brackets. Example: [penis] or: [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged. Yes, even female breasts. IRL GORE IS NOT PERMITTED UNDER ANY CONDITION.

top 31 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] oshitwaddup@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz 53 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

As long as something that might get me in trouble if my boss saw it is marked as nsfw (and so blurred by default) i don't care. So i think any level is fine so long as it's tagged appropriately

Edit: I wasn't thinking about gore. Personally i'd prefer that not be allowed but if it is and blurred i can accept that

[–] pezmaker@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Seconded. If it's marked nsfw and blurred, it's my choice to view at that point and I don't give a shit. My bad for playing roulette and losing if I clicked it and regret it.

[–] oshitwaddup@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz 3 points 2 years ago

Exactly

[–] catsup@lemmy.one 40 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Personally, I'm fine with sexual content as long as it's marked properly. But gore (aka NSFL content) should not be allowed here

[–] YolkBrushWork402@kbin.social 22 points 2 years ago

Yeah i think Gore, any kind of gore should not be allowed here.

[–] PaigePalisade@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thanks for not having different rules for men and women

[–] moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No problem! Feels pretty ass backwards that most places don't

[–] Silviecat44@vlemmy.net 1 points 2 years ago

Do most women want it though?

[–] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 years ago

So who is going to take one for the team and start fucking cakes?

[–] CreamyWeenie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I'm cool with it as long as it's marked, I just think we need to establish a line on what counts as NSFW or not since some things toe the line. Like are we hardline marking anything even remotely sexual, or just things that are clearly NSFW. Obviously the former would be easier to moderate because of the subjective nature of things, so I wouldn't be opposed to that.

Also do mods not have the ability to edit a post so they are marked as NSFW if it's not already marked?

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And please for the love of fuck make a difference between NSFW sexual and NSFW gore

[–] CreamyWeenie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

For the sake of putting in my opinion I agree gore shouldn't be allowed here. Although I'm pretty sure that's already the case considering the instance we're in and also this community's origin.

[–] abs_mess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 years ago

Pretty sure tagging nsfw imagery is standard. Stuff like cropped porn, horny art and the like. Horny text gets a pass I think. Not sure about NSFL

[–] buckykat@lemmy.fmhy.ml 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If cannibalism is fine why not titties

[–] ch1cken@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If cannibalism is fine

??? wtf? sarcasm?

[–] moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Check my post history. We genuinely had to have a vote on wether to allow "cannibalposting"

[–] buckykat@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

six days ago, the previous poll

[–] Rekticulum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago

Yet another in a series of mod W after mod W

load more comments