Usenet

1939 readers

1 users here now

We are a thriving community dedicated to helping users old and new understand and use usenet

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

postman@lemmy.world

[W] DrunkenSlug Invite Greatly Appreciated (lemmy.world)

submitted 5 months ago by weaponG@lemmy.world to c/usenet@lemmy.world

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The title says it all!

all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 6 points 5 months ago (5 children)

I encourage everyone considering sending the invite to review OP's comment history. I was about to share one but yikes.

[–] weaponG@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

We may not all think alike or obtain the same Linux ISOs. I am okay with that and feel we all should be okay with differing opinions and viewpoints, especially in a secular society.

I defended the comedian Dave Chapelle and questioned the term "toxic masculinity" in 2 posts which lead to a long (and apparently scrutinized) comment history.

[–] Outtatime@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Based comment history. If I had any invites left I would have given it to you. I can't stand people who stalk people's comment history. It's friggin stupid

[–] weaponG@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Thanks. We reached that dystopian part where people are judged based on their social credits and "likability" and conformance index to the masses.

[–] Outtatime@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

It's truly insane.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I expect to be held liable for people I invite to other people's places, therefore I don't invite randos or people that have proven to have little regard for others.

[–] weaponG@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Invitations and referrals do carry liability. However, I would say that if you have a differing opinion, others attack with little regard. The "mob mentality" is inert and affluent in social media. Then you are left to defend your differing viewpoint, leaving a trail of more dissenting comments which are also attacked to the nth degree. I honestly thought this federated experiment would be different. I was wrong.

[–] weaponG@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

If that is how you evaluate individuals, I wouldn't accept the invite. Principle means more than some invite to an indexer.

[–] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago

Big yikes

[–] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

Goddamn. No kidding.

[–] seang96@spgrn.com -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Any chance I could get one off of you? I have been waiting for a post for open sign ups haha. I don't mind not having it since I have 2 other indexers so not really in a rush for it.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 months ago

I have plenty of invites so that's no problem, just send me your email over PM.

[–] bradboimler@startrek.website 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not sure why everyone is saying to not give the invite all I can see is comments about free speech and such and that is true we all have freedom of speech under the constitution?? Confused.

[–] weaponG@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Critical thinking is hindered with group think. Thanks for objectively reviewing my comment history.