this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
55 points (88.7% liked)

politics

19062 readers
3793 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 33 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Lol, yea just give your money to a convicted fraudster.

[–] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Who even had his charity shut down for fraud. Too many scams to keep track of.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago

That’s clearly been his strategy. Flood the zone so the big crimes are less noticeable, or less shocking.

[–] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

These people are so fucking stupid....

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

What's that law about profiting from a crime?

[–] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

That's fine, let them waste their money on the orange turd and not give it down ballot. He's still going to lose, again

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Most of that will be channeled to pay his civil fines, etc. I doubt the RNC or any state GOP committee is going to see much from it.

Silver linings and all that..

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

His commissary is gonna be LIT

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

We will see if he survives shorting a fellow inmate three cigs.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Edit - actually I think I owe both Heath Ledger and the fictional character he was playing an apology now... feels dirty.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A CBS News analysis of the Trump campaign's fundraising through April found he has received an influx in donations following key moments in his legal battles.

He likewise saw a bump when a different judge in New York ordered him to pay $454 million in fines and interest in his civil fraud case in February.

FEC filings show Democrats have more cash on hand, but an influx of donations following his conviction could help Trump catch up.

Trump's ads in the wake of the verdict echo the theme of his rhetoric throughout the trial: that the charges against him were part of a politically motivated effort by Democrats to weaken his campaign.

One of his most widely viewed ads prior to his conviction repeated the falsehood that the trial was spearheaded by the Biden administration, when in fact it was a state case prosecuted by the Manhattan district attorney.

Trump is now doubling down on the narrative, urging those who visit his WinRed donation page to "NEVER SURRENDER" under a photo of the mugshot that previously helped him raise millions.


The original article contains 593 words, the summary contains 180 words. Saved 70%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Down ballot GOP in shambles 😭😭😭

Lol Cucked his own party like always.

[–] FollyDolly@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Is this just a new fancy way of saying money laundering?