this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
193 points (93.7% liked)

World News

38847 readers
2434 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 4 months ago (3 children)

banning puberty blockers for trans kids but allowing cis kids (who have been using them for like four decades without harm) on the start of pride is pretty absurd.

it also shows that it's not actually about protecting kids but about impose section 28.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub 47 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

This is evil. This will lead to deaths of children. Fuck everyone involved. I wish there was a hell for TERFs to go to.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Somehow I don’t think many Tories are TERFs

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 35 points 4 months ago (77 children)

Unless someone is against trans people existing, is there any merit to doing this? Why make a person go through puberty twice just because they're "too young" to decide?

[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 35 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Trans people have been chosen as the current boogeyman of the UK for them to expiate for their own failings as a country, and for the consecutive disasters provoked by the Tories. It's a sleight of hand that allows them to distract the public with a fear without basis on reality in order to avoid taking responsibility of their own failures.

[–] dch82@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Hey, I thought it was the people who come on boats!

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

Where I live, immigrants are the new boogeymen too. But the Conservatives have a big market in immigrants too, so when "other immigrants, not YOU immigrants" doesn't work, I guess that's what trans people are for! Lol

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 months ago

because they know starmer's labour will continue to go along with it.

load more comments (75 replies)
[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Remember when they said they werent coming for our kids? I remember. Ill remember for next time too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

WTAF is happening right now.

Sir? SIR! Stop the train, I demand to get off at once!

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

As you step off the train you are met with the void. As the last glimpse of the train disappears you realized you are doomed to wander the void forever.

(I honestly don't really know were this comment is going. It just sounded funny in my head.)

Spelling

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

TERF island is at it again, huh?

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 6 points 4 months ago

All this time everyone thought we loved tea, turns out it was actually just TE

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Trans-exclusionary radical feminist.

They generally refer to themselves as "gender-critical feminists".

The first part "trans-exclusionary" is pretty self-explanatory. "Radical" meaning they believe the whole system needs an overhaul, and mostly comes from the branch of feminism that TERFs/gender-criticals grew out of.

[–] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 months ago

I prefer the term Feminist Appropriating Ridiculous Transphobe (FART)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Trans exclusionary rad fem. It’s a radical feminist that basically believes that your gender assigned at birth is fixed and cannot change

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›