this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
902 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

59696 readers
2772 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Apple to Limit iPhone 15 USB-C Cables to USB 2.0 Speeds: Report::undefined

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] coffee@lemm.ee 302 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Kodemystic@lemmy.kodemystic.dev 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Psaldorn@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

They already said that

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MentalEdge@ani.social 207 points 1 year ago (15 children)

TFW a wifi transfer literally loads files from your phone faster than a fucking cable.

[–] TurnItOff_OnAgain@lemmy.world 110 points 1 year ago (22 children)

That's the point. Expect the iPhone 17 to be portless to the consumer.

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] AbsolutelyNotCats@lemdro.id 187 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Amazing how this company is so successful knowing they're just scamming their clients

[–] Oneobi@lemmy.world 85 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And yet their anti-consumer practices continues to be hailed by their loyal customer base.

It's mind blowing.

"A fool and his money are soon parted."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bookmeat@lemm.ee 134 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Apple fanboys drooling over the company as it continues to shit on them.

[–] Michal@programming.dev 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I doubt your typical apple user will use the usb port for anything other than charging.

If they are going to improve transfer speeds it's not going to happen in the same iteration they're being made to switch to usb c for two reasons:

  1. They want to incetivise users to upgrade to a newer model 16
  2. They will want to take credit for faster speeds. Otherwise people will think usb c is just faster than lighting they were stuck with for years.
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DrRatso@lemmy.world 115 points 1 year ago (22 children)

ITT people pretending this is a spite based move, when realistically it is probably cutting costs by reusing the same hardware they used for lightning ports just soldering on a USB-C port instead of a lightning one.

[–] Rootiest@lemm.ee 158 points 1 year ago (3 children)

A shining example of cutting edge Apple innovation

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 76 points 1 year ago (7 children)

dude usb 3.0 is 15 years old by now, and they're a trillion dollar company. They'll manage, this is 100% by choice

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 year ago

On a thousand dollar phone

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] nathris@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The SoC lacks the hardware. Even the USB C iPads with A series chips operate at 2.0 speeds. They can only do 5Gbit in host mode, like with an external SSD. Plugged in to a computer they are 2.0.

I would imagine future chips will have the capability, once the Pro chips trickle down to the base models.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] witx@lemmy.sdf.org 92 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (39 children)

How do apple fan boys keeps eating this shit-sandwich year after year?

load more comments (39 replies)
[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 86 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They are going to limit it to USB 2.0 speeds so in 3 or 4 years they can declare some new magical advancement and bump it up to full 3.0 speeds.

Apple purposefully limits things so that they have something to announce in the future. They aren't dumb. They know the advancements in smartphones has been starting to slow down. So they meter out the advances over many years in incremental updates to give their customers a reason to upgrade.

You will hear something like this from every reviewer after an Apple event: "The changes were small, but taken together the new insert product name here might be well worth the upgrade price."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 81 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In other news: company with long history of selling over-priced, under featured products to aspirational nitwits does it again!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheMadnessKing@lemdro.id 77 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, I can't wait for them to launch the newest innovative tech of Type C for iPhone, which will offer more speed and better compatibility cause they are the good guys who swear they would protect your data and keep an eye on your photos too.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I have family who actually believes all of what you just said. The tribalism can get a bit much.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] t0m5k1@lemmy.world 74 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Why anyone would buy into this crap is beyond me.

[–] kvothelu@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they have created the culture of superiority. a posh product for our shallow acquaintances. it's a great filter test actually.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Album@lemmy.ca 71 points 1 year ago (8 children)

ITT: people who don't realize that most USB-C cables are USB 2.0

[–] bizzle@midwest.social 88 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Which is fine, I have a full speed USBC cable and it's a thicc boi that I certainly wouldn't want to shove in my pocket all the time and the 2.0 speed ones still charge my laptop even. But Apple is limiting the PORT, not the cable, which isn't cool.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] aleph@lemm.ee 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

This is irrelevant.

We're talking about smartphones here, and most new Android phones support > 3.0.

Limiting a flagship phone in 2023 to USB 2.0 transfer and charging speeds is a cheapskate move.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MargotRobbie@lemm.ee 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

Well, charger cables are usually at USB 2.0 speed because USB-PD works the same, but signal integrity doesn't matter as much, so you can make a longer, more flexible cable without using in-cable shielding...

So this is misleading, since the included cable coming in 2.0 speed (missing pins) absolutely does not mean that the iPhone USB-C port will only support 2.0.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (4 children)

To the surprise of no one. However, EU is already on top of this. After this law was enacted they realized just how scummy Apple is, not sure how they managed to miss that especially considering they have to fine them and threaten with market ban if they didn't uphold 2 year mandatory warranty consumer protection laws in EU guarantee.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What a messy article. The title says that the cables are limited to 2.0 speeds (which they might as well be), the subtitle mentions charging speed as opposed to transfer speed and the article itself then talks about the port on the device having 2.0 speeds (for non "Pro" models).

Anyways, of course they gimp the base model on purpose. Every company does to set the more expensive models apart obviously, but Apple drives it to the extremes especially in recent years, which makes their line-up incredibly confusing. I mean they've gone out of their way to make their 10th gen base iPad use the old Apple Pencil, and they still don't laminate the display even after they redesigned the exterior.

If you want a new iPhone this fall and you're looking for something in the price range of the standard iPhone 15 (which will still be a very expensive phone of course), I'd recommend looking for previous year's "Pro" model. The iPhone 13 Pro dropped around the iPhone 14 price at launch, and it's essentially better in almost every way.

And because people will mention it: of course, you can also get a phone from a different manufacturer if it suits you, or keep your current phone.

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 51 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Usb 2.0 is 23 years old now.

There's a line between "enhancing the pro model by shitting on everyone else" but like this is just disrespectful.

But hey your money, spend that shit as stupidly as you want

(3.0 came out 15 years ago for reference, it'll be older than some kids getting the phone ffs)

[–] gamer@lemm.ee 38 points 1 year ago

but like this is just disrespectful.

The word you’re looking for is “anti-consumer”

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

So, worse than a Galaxy S5. Got it.

[–] raptir@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Little bit of a strange article.

First, it's about data transfer speeds. I don't think... anyone else in my extended family, and certainly none of the iPhone users, use a cable to transfer data frequently.

But more importantly - the subtitle of the article says that only the pro models offer faster charging speeds. Despite the article being exclusively about data transfer speeds.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 27 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Why?

Not that I use the junk this company ships to stores but a part of me would like to hear the meeting where someone proposed this and the rationale to support it.

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Easy. Because then it means that the easiest way to get files off your phone to your computer (definitely a Mac, right? RIGHT?) is via an iCloud subscription. Why sell a cable for $10 when you can sell a monthly subscription for $3?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Merely a rumor. Apple is known to put multiple false rumors into their supplier chain to find leakers.

I’m going to wait for the upcoming formal announcement and specs.

[–] egeres@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm confused, is this a strategy meant to persuade people to keep using the lightning cable bullshit?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] couragethebravedog@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless it's limited by hardware this will be a main cause for jailbreaking your iPhone.

[–] protput@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What makes you say that? 90% of the users don't even connect their iPhone to a pc anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›