this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
736 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59742 readers
3000 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Los Angeles Police Department has warned residents to be wary of thieves using technology to break into homes undetected. High-tech burglars have apparently knocked out their victims' wireless cameras and alarms in the Los Angeles Wilshire-area neighborhoods before getting away with swag bags full of valuables. An LAPD social media post highlights the Wi-Fi jammer-supported burglaries and provides a helpful checklist of precautions residents can take.

Criminals can easily find the hardware for Wi-Fi jamming online. It can also be cheap, with prices starting from $40. However, jammers are illegal to use in the U.S.

We have previously reported on Wi-Fi jammer-assisted burglaries in Edina, Minnesota. Criminals deployed Wi-Fi jammer(s) to ensure homeowners weren't alerted of intrusions and that incriminating video evidence wasn't available to investigators.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In my big American metro area, the burglars usually mask up and roll in with swapped plates, a car they stole, or a car they got off a Kia boy for $100-$200. They’re tough to catch in the act or identify with video surveillance, even with a new hardwired or pre-WiFi hardwired system.

[–] CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] aphonefriend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago

Own a musket for home defense, since that's what the founding fathers intended. Four ruffians break into my house. "What the devil?" As I grab my powdered wig and Kentucky rifle. I blow a golf ball sized hole through the first man, he's dead on the spot. I draw my pistol on the second man, miss him entirely because it's smoothbore and nails the neighbors dog. I have to resort to the cannon mounted at the top of the stairs loaded with grape shot, "Tally ho lads" the grape shot shreds two men in the blast, the sound and extra shrapnel set off car alarms. Fix bayonet and charge the last terrified rapscallion. He Bleeds out waiting on the police to arrive since triangular bayonet wounds are impossible to stitch up. Just as the founding fathers intended.

[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Something tells me that systems will just have a strong dummy wireless signal act as a tripwire and then it goes down, it triggers stuff...even super low end stuff could implement it.

[–] Kelsenellenelvial@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago

Some systems already have that. Replaced a switch yesterday and re-arranged some things on my network board and got a HomeKit notification that some things were offline and when it came back. Knowing when something goes offline isn’t as useful as keeping things up though. With something like a hardwired camera/NVR, even if your ISP service is interrupted the cameras can still record, and you can put a UPS there to keep things going, even if the rest of the network is down.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Easiest way to avoid this bullshit is to install wired cameras, and such a way that they are not easy to access/cut.

I know someones gonna come in and be all "BUHBUHBUT YOU CAN JUST DESTROY THE CAMERAS" and yeah, thats true.

but you cant destroy the camera from 3 blocks over, you have to get right up on them, and your face/vehicle/other helpful information may just well be caught and recorded before you do. Unlike wifi jamming, which could be done from streets away.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 4 months ago

Me being cheap pays off; wifi cameras are expensive as fuck so I just have wired ones that don't do anything on the Internet.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Physical locks, physical keys. We are collectively becoming too "smart" for our own good

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Physical locks and keys are also easy to bypass.

[–] phlegmy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

Not sure how that’ll help with doorbells and cameras not working?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

That's why wireless security devices are a joke. And it is not only WiFi, this is BlueTooth and other protocols like that, too.

Good security (and common sense, too) would be to have such devices wired up. And check the spectrum for jammers and raise an alarm about that, too.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 5 points 4 months ago (9 children)

I’m curious if these are actual jammers or just deauth devices.

It also seems really risky because I think we have three different bands Wi-Fi devices use now?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] IMongoose@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

FCC is gunna start blasting

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›