this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
678 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2861 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Updates:

Might be best for mods to lock this post at this point (is that a thing on Lemmy?) because this story is basically wrapped. The FBI says a bullet caused some ear damage. Maybe it was bullet shrapnel from a ricochet or something like that, but later photos show the teleprompters in-tact so it wasn't shards of glass from those. Trump's usage of the bandage (and the assassination attempt) as symbols and political tools has been discussed at length and I don't think conspiratorial thinking beyond that is very productive. Pete Souza took his own account down after getting a lot of harassment, so no further conspiracies are needed regarding X-formerly-known-as-Twitter at this time.

A photo of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump taken on Saturday without his ear bandage has sparked a wave of speculation.

The image, taken by Alex Brandon of the Associated Press on July 27 and shared by photojournalist Pete Souza on X, formerly Twitter, shows Trump walking up an airplane staircase with an apparently fully healed ear wound just weeks after he was shot with a high-powered rifle.

Souza, known for his tenure as the chief official White House photographer for Presidents Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama, posted Brandon's photo on his now-deactivated X account on Saturday, writing, "AP photo this morning. Look closely at his ear that was 'hit' by a bullet from an AR-15 assault rifle."

Souza's profile, @PeteSouza, which had over 200,000 followers, now reads, "This account doesn't exist, try searching for another," implying that he has deleted or deactivated it. If he had been banned, it would read, "Account suspended. X suspends accounts which violate the X rules."

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Serious question: are we absolutely positive it was his blood?

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Right after the assassination attempt there were joking references to Trump's history with professional wrestling and the practice of "[blading](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blading_(professional_wrestling))", ie, using a concealed razor to cut yourself during a fight in order to make it seem like you'd been injured. It was funny, but I didn't think anyone was taking it seriously.

Now I'm genuinely starting to wonder. What the heck happened here? The odds of a bullet grazing just so exactly perfectly close to make him bleed, but not to produce any actual long-lasting damage, are lower than all kinds of other ridiculous ideas. I don't even see any bruising in this photo. Elderly people often have a tendency to bruise quite easily.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tgs1999@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (25 children)

I genuinely, since the day it happened, have not believed that Trump was shot.

I watched over and over again and I swear what I saw was WWE theatre.

I would have believed an attempt on his life, from someone anywhere on the Political spectrum (I even said this before info about the shooter came out).

However, I don’t believe Trump. He has had a white mark on his ear for years. The “scab” that he’s playing off as a wound has been there for years.

He is the liar/the first beast!

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So, I've had hangnails that left more of a wound and took longer to heal.

I wonder if diaper Donnie actually got merc'd that day and this is just a cheap clone from wish.com

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gestrid@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I mean, sure. He's rich. He probably got plastic surgery or something to fix his ear.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hopefully this means mods start issuing apologies to people and restoring all the posts that questioned this to begin with, that they decried as baseless conspiracy theories.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (8 children)

Are we really going to propose baseless conspiracy theories about his ear? This shitty res photo proves nothing at all imo. This didn't happen yesterday and no one on Lemmy has seen the wound clearly.

The only news here is that a photographer got banned for posting it

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

As the article mentioned, the photographer took down their own account.

[–] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (4 children)

They reached out to Souza, but did not confirm that he deactivated it himself.

Souza's profile, @PeteSouza, which had over 200,000 followers, now reads, "This account doesn't exist, try searching for another," implying that he has deleted or deactivated it. If he had been banned, it would read, "Account suspended. X suspends accounts which violate the X rules."

Although seeing as how Elon violated Twitters rules this week by posting AI political content, I wouldn't put it past him to deactivate someone else's account on their behalf.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Technotica@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You think old, pea brained, waddling trump could fake being hit by a bullet and then apply fake blood (or have it applied) while on camera?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] riskable@programming.dev 5 points 3 months ago

I'm skeptical of this photo. There's no way Trump can handle stairs like that. Unless the photo was taken after one of his usual, "pause for 3 seconds after each step cuz this is just too much."

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not a surprise. Everything about the man is fake

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›