917
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] RebiJes@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago

A lot of their success is due to their tactic of rushing into the enemy without any care for supply lines and logistics. This often worked to their advantage but most of those early wins were not sustainable in the long run. It gave the impression that they were more powerful than they actually were.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 3 points 2 years ago

Leeroy jenkins is a short term solution

[-] Tekkip20@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

The baddie germans were the Leroy Jenkins of WWII, just charging in and expecting shit to work.

Didn't work out well when the sovvies clapped their cheeks all the way back to Berlin

[-] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Haha yeah

Wonder who this reminds me of

[-] Noodle07@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Belgium 100% won that war

[-] B312@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Tbf they did good for most of it

[-] Wanderer@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago
[-] sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They fought most of the rest of the world all at once and it was pretty touch-and-go there for a bit.

If Hitler had died of a meth overdose in early 1940 I could see the universe of 'The Man In The High Castle' coming to pass.

As it stands, meth heads gonna meth, and he decided fighting on 2 fronts was fine.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
917 points (98.3% liked)

Greentext

8803 readers
471 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS