this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
244 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19135 readers
2318 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The ex-president got a top aide to send the texts accusing the donor’s massive Preserve America PAC of being run by RINOs. But aides fear he is being manipulated.

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 110 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I am really enjoying watching him suffer.

[–] Bapanada@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Me too, and schadenfreude isn’t something I often enjoy.

[–] Peer@discuss.tchncs.de 59 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Is it not illegal for a candidate to coordinate directly with a PAC?

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago

Didn't you hear: the law only applies to poor people.

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 months ago

I'm wondering how his Supreme Court cronies will cover for him this time. He isn't the president, so this can't be an official act.

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

He is probably not from a legal standpoint. He is talking to her and she just funds the pac and selects the people who run it. It's super easy to get around that law.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago

I believe the distinction is a Super PAC. I'm not sure of the specific differences outside of a Super Pac may not be for a specific candidate and can be funded without donation disclosures.

[–] greenshirtdenimjeans@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The billionaire in question?

Garth Algar

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

His little weird hands just flying on his cell phone!

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] breakingcups@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Ike Perlmutter*, the former Marvel Entertainment boss, is.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 months ago

Should the aides call an elder abuse hotline?

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -5 points 3 months ago

Daily Beast - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Daily Beast:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.thedailybeast.com/manipulated-donald-trump-blows-up-billionaire-megadonor-miriam-adelsons-phone-with-angry-texts
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support