Linux

I like XFCE. It's the only DE that was just happy to run in my super weird setup without issues.

There is a place for graphically gorgeous distro's

As a current KDE user but extensive user of XFCE in the past, it may not come "pretty" out-of-the-box but XFCE can be a very aesthetically pleasing desktop environment. It can be configured just about every which way, and if I had to switch back to XFCE right now I could have things just about how I want them and be 100% as happy with my desktop as I am with KDE.

It's got defaults that just make sense, doesn't try to reinvent the wheel or the way we interact with our desktops, it's light and fast and reliable. It's associated default programs (Thunar, etc.) follow the same design paradigms and are a delight to use.

I Iove XFCE, and it will always have a special place in my heart.

I remember installing XFCE on an old Pentium 3 tower some office had stored under the stairs. It was like magic - the system just... worked again?! It was the first time I successfully installed Linux and it felt so fast. With Windows the thing barely worked.

That became my younger sister's first computer. The tower and monitor etc. all just stayed on the ground and we played games on it together. Eventually I found an ethernet card and learned how to plug it in. I ran an ethernet cable from our modem through the house along the floor. Then we could go on Myspace and send email to each other.

Can't believe my parents were ok with tripping over all that stuff, ha!

XFCE is the distro for getting stuff done. I run it even on new PCs. I know that whatever device I'm using, because of XFCE, my desktop is gonna be blindingly fast. I try to switch to other desktops sometimes but I always go back to XFCE because the speed and reliability are off the charts. Windows wishes it could be this (it kind of was, in the XP or 7 era).

All XFCE needs is better defaults in terms of aesthetics.

Every time I try another DE I always come back to XFCE. Lightweight, stays out of the way, gets the job done. NEVER crashes. Ever.

Xfce is such a great interface.

If you ever run a "mostly server", where you are mostly in the command line but sometimes want to pop into a GUI for whatever reason, XFCE. I have a computer from 2000 with Ubuntu server plus XFCE after the fact, and it runs great. Still.

As a poor person with low-end, old hardware, I love XFCE. It has extended my laptop’s practical use-life by at least 8 years now, and counting.

Xfce has been great at giving old PCs some extra life. I've got some people using a Pentium E2180/2GB Ram/Hard Drive machine for some browsing with Mint Xfce. It runs great and is quite reliable. I just hope that it does eventually gain support for Wayland.

I main and ♥️ xfce. we are friends now 🤣 and anybody else that feels the way we do. 🫂

Eeepc... Dude, I miss the days of 300$ netbooks 😞 would still have my Dell Mini 9, but it got stolen.

Can I just say that my favorite thing about Xfce users is that whenever the dumb "GNOME vs KDE" shit starts, you guys are all chill in the back being like, "let them fight while I drink my tea and move on with my life".

I might be a very longtime Plasma user, but I appreciate the shit out of Xfce and what its capable of while being light as a feather. Other than Budgie, it's the only DE I could actually see myself using if I absolutely had to ditch KDE for whatever reason. Although my reliance on Dolphin alone makes that very, very difficult. Thunar is pretty good, though. More file managers should have batch renaming built-in. Then I wouldn't have to use GPRename or KRename for so much shit.

my first foray with linux was Xubuntu. transferred to MX Linux since but stayed with xfce. looking into having a go with xfce Debian. so satisfied with this DE, am not even tempted to try others.

I came across xfce very recently looking for something that ran well on a 10-year-old laptop. I started with ubuntu but you could feel the weight of it - tried mint, pop os, eventually found my way to Debian with xfce, which runs great.

Xfce has been my main desktop for 15 years. I keep trying KDE and Gnome every now and then, but Xfce just delivers serious reliability and just enough configurability to make it great.

Xfce is the Linux I appreciate. Its not made heavy for some opinionated features addition and setups are exposed to users.

There is also a place for DEs that are more opinionated and polished out of the box, its fine. But I'm glad composable things such as Xfce still exists.

XFCE is seriously underrated.

XFCE is my favorite Desktop Environment, and I use a lot of their apps (because they're they're very good and don't have many dependencies) as a part of my Window Manager workflow.

The first Linux distro I used was Xubuntu and I've use Xfce primarily ever since. I've used a lot of different distros over the years but have almost always used Xfce. I think my only serious time away from it was using Plasma for a while before Xfce had hidpi support.

It does have some issues. Like when using multiple workspaces and you get a popup on a different one it will move that whole application over to your current workspace. That is just extremely annoying for my usecases. KDE plasma does not do that, I think it might be a GDK thing?

I come from Motif, mwm, so for me Xfce is the best. I'm using it with MX Linux, superb distro too.

Runs great on my raspberry pi 400. With rpios upgraded to Debian Sid.

I adore XFCE, simple, functional, lightweight. What more do you need? I am currently running pop_os which defaults to Gnome and by comparison it just feels heavy and clunky. The other DE I had love for was enlightenment years ago. A purely keyboard driven DE. It was glorious.

Using gnome now, but have always enjoyed Xfce. Was going to use it for my current setup, but at the time it didn't support Wayland. It looks like it's getting close, but not quite there yet.

Maybe once Wayland is fully supported I'll give it a shot again.

And you're running Xfce ≥4.14? Pretty impressive that they kept it lightweight despite switching to GTK3.