this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
671 points (99.3% liked)

Privacy

32142 readers
1221 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google's campaign against ad blockers across its services just got more aggressive. According to a report by PC World, the company has made some alterations to its extension support on Google Chrome.

Google Chrome recently changed its extension support from the Manifest V2 framework to the new Manifest V3 framework. The browser policy changes will impact one of the most popular adblockers (arguably), uBlock Origin.

The transition to the Manifest V3 framework means extensions like uBlock Origin can't use remotely hosted code. According to Google, it "presents security risks by allowing unreviewed code to be executed in extensions." The new policy changes will only allow an extension to execute JavaScript as part of its package.

Over 30 million Google Chrome users use uBlock Origin, but the tool will be automatically disabled soon via an update. Google will let users enable the feature via the settings for a limited period before it's completely scrapped. From this point, users will be forced to switch to another browser or choose another ad blocker.

Archive link

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 161 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In their eyes they just made 30 million more customers.

Fucking parasites.

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 102 points 3 months ago (26 children)

They made Firefox a good number of new customers.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 67 points 3 months ago (5 children)

I‘m really anxious for firefox as google is the main financier afaik.

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 39 points 3 months ago (20 children)

It is a worry. I think we might end up needing to pay for Firefox ourselves.

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 34 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I will happily donate.
If, of course, money won't go to the CEO.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] kusivittula@sopuli.xyz 18 points 3 months ago (6 children)

look up ladybird. we may soon have a 3rd browser!

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 12 points 3 months ago (9 children)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Mikina@programming.dev 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

IIRC, only like 2% of Mozilla spending goes towards FF (I may be misinterpreting something, but I remember 2% being thrown around), so funding FF without rest of Mozilla bullshit shouldn't be that hard. Of course, since Mozilla did spend so little on FF, it's a question how much they actually care about FF and what would happen if they lost access to their golden goose. They shouldn't have problem funding FF, but they probably have other bullshit they don't want to let go and that has more priority for them.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Mikina@programming.dev 14 points 3 months ago

You are right, it was unfairly harsh wording, I apologize for that. Most of those products are super cool and important, I've kind of extrapolated it from what I've read in other posts about them spending too much on stuff like events and other, non-developemnt, related stuff that I actually never checked, while also not realizing that they also have a ton of other projects, which mixed with the dissapointment with the recent development about the Meta partnership led to me choosing that wording unfairly.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] feoh@lemmy.ml 101 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Friends don't let friends run Chrome.

[–] LoamImprovement@beehaw.org 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Switched to Firefox in 2023 and it's wild how much shit just works now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago

Couldn't have said it better.

[–] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 78 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Not only intrusive ads, intrusive trackers too

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 58 points 3 months ago

Remember like 2 weeks ago when Google's very own ad networks were distributing malware?

Pepperidge Farm remembers.

[–] TaintPuncher@lemmy.ml 48 points 3 months ago (5 children)

It’s not perfect but PiHole will still catch a lot of the ads if you have the know-how to set one up. Tis a relatively cheap and easy solution that has the benefit of being able to block ads network-wide, providing your router lets you set a custom DNS.

https://pi-hole.net

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 20 points 3 months ago (25 children)

Even if my Internet provider forced me to use their router I'd plug my own router in behind that one fuck that.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] variants@possumpat.io 17 points 3 months ago

Even cheaper to just stop using chrome

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] zod000@lemmy.ml 46 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Screw you Google. Enjoy your antitrust.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 44 points 3 months ago

Its a good thing I've been using Firefox for almost 2 decades then.

[–] Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 3 months ago (12 children)

Stop using chrome and move to Firefox, also stop using Windows and more to Linux.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Modva@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago

Moved to Firefox some months ago, it's fine. Small adjustment but browsers generally offer high interchangeability

[–] panicnow@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You can get a pass till July 2025 by creating/setting a registry key that they made for businesses.

Paste this in a .reg file and double click it.

Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Google\Chrome]
"ExtensionManifestV2Availability"=dword:00000002
[–] blackwateropeth@lemmy.world 39 points 3 months ago (1 children)

At this rate people should just cut the cord with google. Modifying reg files is almost as annoying as moving bookmarks over. Firefox + uBlock + pihole (if you’re feeling ambitious/want to block other crap that’s non-browser related) and you’re chillin.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Moving bookmarks takes about 10 seconds to do.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 35 points 3 months ago

you could instead just download firefox, which isnt perfect either but still a huge improvement over any chromium browser

[–] crazyminner@lemmy.ml 35 points 3 months ago

And thus, this day will be remembered as the great browser migration.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 15 points 3 months ago

Bust this trust.

[–] Mikina@programming.dev 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm not sure what Mullvad is based on - i think it's on Tor, which is Firefox based?

I do use mostly LibreWolf, but if FF also went to shit, I wonder if Tor, and thus Mullvad, would keep on going or not. Because I suppose LibreWolf would have troubles with keeping up, if Mozilla would enshitify FF, since they would probably have to fork and continue development on their own.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Browser engines are ridiculously complex, nearly on the level of operating systems. All of the Firefox forks are really just different UIs built around Gecko/Quantum - those other projects aren't really maintaining their own engines, they're dependent on Mozilla's work to remain stable, secure and relevant.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 months ago

mullvad browser is based on FF

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 months ago

This is the perfect time to go aggressive on telling your friends to switch to Firefox

[–] Mikina@programming.dev 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (8 children)

If it keeps going on like this, it won't be long before I'll just say fuck it and switch to elinks...

Hmm, on that note - is there any CLI web browser that can do javascript and css? Because iirc, elinks doesn't, though I havent used it in years.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The title should be "Google pulls plug out of Chromium"

Too bad that even when people start switching, people writing drafts for the W3 spec are mostly Google employees. I'm sure that'll be their next battleground.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›