this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
175 points (99.4% liked)

News

23827 readers
3313 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 77 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Pivot to AI! These companies are going to be in for a rude awakening when the AI scam collapses.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 13 points 5 months ago

What else is there? Hardware has become a commodity product and server side software is mainly modified FOSS.

[–] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

What exactly is the AI scam?

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Copying everyone's work and dumping out shitty versions of it. Using people behind the scenes to give your software the feel of having true intelligence. It is a con job.

[–] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Ah, gotcha. I totally agree in that case, but that also sounds like standard capitalism. lol. And that shit is going strong!

Companies involved in delivering AI solutions are over-selling it. In the long term it will produce much less value than investors have been led to believe. A hype train, if you will.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

The bubble just keeps growing. CEOs and hedge funds pumping it will be long gone when this thing pops

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 50 points 5 months ago (3 children)

My company did this same thing like a week ago and the CEO was bragging about his leadership insight lol

All the tech companies are doing this same shit. It's just layoffs with an excuse so they don't look as bad for their failures.

What ai features do we really need from Cisco? None lol

[–] Waldowal@lemmy.world 38 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

With AI based routing, the switches will use AI to read the destination IP, look it up in the routing table, and send the traffic there. It's the same as it was before, but AI. Also, it will occasionally hallucinate and send your traffic to someone else.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 5 months ago

All you gotta do to hack it, is challenge the AI to a round of tic-tac-toe (which for some reason confounds the models.)

[–] cakeistheanswer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 months ago

Cisco has been clueless for awhile. The people who want speed don't trust them to do basic network stacks, they want to do something more complicated?

The HFT industry noticed Cisco was messing with routing stacks, and you can essentially look to the entire market cap of Arista as a direct result. Specifically people wanting to avoid the headaches of the nexus line (EOS is nice!).

They are the victims of their own success to the point they long ago cannibalized actual product innovation. A lot of the industry still wants their certs, but nobody I know who values speed (local stripped back switches) or stability/availability (AWS and minimal office equipment) would chose them for much. A lot of the purchases are from big players with long contracts, the "Nobody got fired for IBM" of network equipment.

This just screams moving deck chairs on the Titanic.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Oh but they’re a-comin’!

/facepalm

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 34 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If I was a Cisco investor, I'd be looking to move my money elsewhere. All these companies laying people off, shuttering whole ass teams, and replacing them with non-proprietary and, frankly, unproven LLMs are going to blow their own legs off here pretty soon. I have a feeling that a pretty dramatic change is AI pricing models is coming soon, since all of these companies are providing access to their models for a fraction of the cost to run them, and the VCs are going to want their money back. Is chatGPT good enough at, what is it, 0.004 cents a token? Maybe, I guess, if the ghost of quality control doesn't haunt you at night. Is chatGPT still good enough at 0.1 cents a token or more, or with surge pricing models? I sincerely doubt it. If openAI implements surge pricing, stay on the lookout for articles about some company or user getting a surprise bill for a million dollars, AWS-style. Given the current quality of LLMs, I don't think that the cost shakes out for what you get.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Before we get to pricing, I’d like to see any successful use case in a corporate environment? Not one that’s sort-of working, or obe that hasn’t panned out yet - just a successful, implemented, customer-facing example.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Good point. I think a bigger problem than the customer facing AIs is going to be the internal ones that make shit up. Someone on here claimed to be working somewhere where they gutted their HR department and replaced them almost completely with an LLM that was fed their documents. They claimed the AI had already told them several blatantly illegal things. Any company that does that is just begging to get sued to death, and I'm sure the investors will be reeeeeaaaaal happy with the, what, 1% they saved by killing HR? I mean, HR aren't the good guys here, but just imagine a company being brain dead enough to say "hey, let's get rid of the people that keep us from getting sued to death and replace it with a chatbot lmao".

[–] ____@infosec.pub 5 points 5 months ago

And here I thought that outsourced "HR" folks were a travesty.

Had a small payroll issue recently having to do with some time off and a misunderstanding by the (outsourced) HR folks, was able to speak with enough people who understood one segment or another of the (rather complex) scenario to get it resolved in a couple of days.

AI would be a hard fail in that application, guaranteed.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

IBM Plans To Replace Nearly 8,000 Jobs With AI — These Jobs Are First to Go

IBM CEO Arvind Krishna announced a hiring pause in May, but that’s not all. Later that month, the CEO also stated the company plans to replace nearly 8,000 jobs with AI.

Krishna noted that back-office functions, specifically in the human resources (HR) sector, will be the first to face these changes. In recent weeks, the company has opened up dozens of positions for AI-based roles to help develop and maintain these systems.

Now that I think about it - that explains a few things . . .

[–] ____@infosec.pub 3 points 5 months ago

At least one giant multi-national corp is actively soliciting examples and use cases from their employees.

"Toy" example submissions is fine, the company is just so eager for something to do with AI - they're hoping for their actual AI folks to be able to take off of that uncompensated IP, while the employee with the idea gets a pat on the head.

Have I had ideas I might otherwise submit and that are well within my capabilities to implement at "toy" level? Hell, yes.

Do I want to contribute concepts into that sort of pipeline? Absolutely not. Not when they more or less automatically own my work product and whatever I do on company time already.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

Oh good, my router was missing AI.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Good. Let AI take all jobs ASAP.

Because then we redistribute the wealth and we don't have to work and can just play and be freeeeee!

Right?

Guys...?

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Sorry, the best we can do is $20 and we wish you good luck

[–] FirstCircle@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Davidson will move to a role advising the CEO during the borg

What does the borg have to do with this?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Resistance is futile.

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The whole article is a shit show. When did it become trendy to use abbreviations like "reorg" and "biz". I work in corporate finance, I've never heard someone talk like that.

[–] FirstCircle@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The redundancies follow declining revenues and shrinking profits.

"Redundancies" is apparently now a noun that refers to employees being laid off.

Intel announced it was eliminating 16,000 people – to curb capital expenses.

Headcount is now a physical asset I guess. Corps must be taking depreciation expenses on employees now in addition to salary expenses. Ka-ching!

After my first browse of the article I was wondering if it had been spewed out by some of the crappy AI that Cisco is so keen on.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 3 points 5 months ago

Thou shall not built a computer in the likeness of a human mind!