this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
24 points (87.5% liked)

politics

19082 readers
3681 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Launched in 2022, the program was set up to provide grants and other funding for sustainable farming practices that keep carbon in the soil, prevent deforestation, and other measures. The price tag, just over $3 billion, was unusually high for a “pilot program,” surpassing the annual budgets of other long-standing conservation programs that, at least theoretically, were supposed to support many of the same farming practices.

“Our goal is to … make sure that small and underserved producers reap the benefits of these market opportunities,” Vilsack said at COP27.

But nearly a year later, the top grants have instead been awarded to large corporate interests, including Tyson, JBS, Cargill, and other organizations underwritten by Big Ag. The program is under renewed scrutiny from watchdog groups, which claim the department has provided limited public information about the selection process for applications, the contracts being negotiated with grant recipients, and the criteria for what exactly constitutes “climate smart.”

“We don’t need USDA facilitating a pay-to-pollute carbon scheme that only goes to benefit big operations,” said Rebecca Wolf, senior policy director at Food & Water Watch.

Nakedly corrupt trash like this is exactly why it's so infuriating when Biden supporters try to back up their bullshit claims about him being so progressive by pointing to the Inflation Reduction Act and American Rescue Plan. Ten years from now we're not going to have made anywhere near the progress we should have on climate change, the rich will be even richer, and moderate Dems will just say "Nobody could have known those Fortune 500 companies were all ripping off taxpayers so badly back then, but this new subsidy is different."

[–] CryptoRoberto@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

All the ag stuff "supporting farmers" has just been code for dumping money the way of huge corporate farms for decades. If it wasn't they'd put specific exemptions in these bills for large corporations getting the bulk of the money.

People need to realize what's going on here. All politicians care about for ag bills is keeping food costs stable/down. Food costs are a huge deal for inflation which has so many knock on effects for the economy. They don't care how it happens. This has just led to corporate welfare for big ag. The government basically brides them and inflates their stock value so they won't gouge us to heavily.

Big ag has gotten so good at funneling these government funds that no one can compete with them and they're now the only game in town. This is such a problem and we just seem to almost ignore it as a society. No one talks about all the reasons this is bad in political platforms, no one is making it an issue.

I'm not a vegan, but I could find some common ground with them on some farm reform. For reasons they would not enjoy.... Chicken in America tastes like shit. Factory farming and this race to the bottom in quality of every area of food in this country have led to terrible, terrible tasting food.

Produce, meat, and everything else at the grocery store gets bought and sold on looks, uniformity and shelf life. The few large companies competing in every market just try to make the biggest heaviest apple, chicken breast, watermelon etc that looks good. How it tastes doesn't even matter. You don't find out until you get home.

Most people don't really notice because all they buy is food from one of th big grocery store chains and they don't offer anything else. That food quality has declined so badly. But it's been gradual so most folks don't notice it. If we had more local farmers who cared about their product, I can guarantee we wouldn't be eating such terrible tasting food with the extremely limited varieties we do. It'd probably cost more, but maybe we wouldn't be as fat and unhealthy.