This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.
The original was posted on /r/newzealand by /u/MermaidDragon566 on 2024-09-18 23:56:37+00:00.
Well this is it. The jury are deliberating. I believe he is guilty but I am concerned it is going to be hard to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. The defence pathologists were compelling, but as prosecution lawyer Alysha McClintock put to them on cross examination, you have to acknowledge that pathology evidence is just one part of the breadth of evidence. To which they agreed "of course." If he is found guilty, it will be his phone records and internet history, and his actions after Pauline's death (such as walking out of the police station after his first interview and immediately deleting hundreds of messages- which left a trace) that will be his downfall.
Thoughts?