this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024

1324 points (97.2% liked)

Political Memes

5602 readers

273 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civil

Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformation

Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memes

Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotion

Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world

Rooki@lemmy.world

automodbeta@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

rjc@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

JonsJava@lemmy.world

WrenFeathers@lemmy.world

1324

Landlords are parasites on society (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 months ago by FenrirIII@lemmy.world to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world

93 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/19930828

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 76 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I had a friend that voted for Brexit. When I asked him why, he said that his grandfather was able to buy a house and take care of his family on his salary. His father was able to do the same. He said, these immigrants come in and live two families to a house and are willing to work for far less. He said, I don't want that type of future for myself.

No amount of telling him that -- the people that caused this issue are also benefitting from Brexit -- could convince him.

Was weird because I wasn't an immigrant but my family was and he was cool with me.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 57 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They come so close. I understand the anger, broken promises from society at large, but then they do that little twist at the end. It's like they're about to win the race, then decide to just veer off into the stands right before getting to the finish line.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 31 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

It's because their pain is very real, their struggles are very real, their feelings are very often valid, and they understand the concrete impact that it has had on them and their way of life.

They can't abstract that out and critically think about why that is the case, so they just repeat what an authority told them and is easy for them to understand.

I don't know though if it is simply a lack of education or an inherent human solipsism that is hard to break through.

It is the same the world over, even before TVs when newspapers brought the news, and before that anything written down was true because "priests and scholars definitely wouldn't lie." That is why extremely strict factual news laws have to be brought into effect with anyone caught lying bearing fines based on a percentage of their revenue to combat fascism that is based wholly on fear fabrication. The problem is, of course, policing that correctly as for example an American Trump regime would simply use those laws to say that anything they don't like is not true (they they do anyway now).

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I think the last step of understanding the issue is difficult because it requires admitting that their current belief and way of life is not optimal for themselves.

Everyone or almost everyone thinks highly of their own decision skills or at least that they do their best. They believe they can make good choices and that they can either outsmart or work harder than others. The truth is that, maybe they can, but there's very little choice in how it's rewarded. The believable lie is that work is compensated fairly, and once someone has put half a life into this lie, it's difficult and soul crushing to admit that it's plain wrong. It may cause frustration and anger, which doesn't solve it. A solution isn't evident or maybe it seems out of reach, causing more frustration, causing more anger. It's a lot easier to take out anger on people than fighting a system. And especially in groups, it's easier to point at smaller minority groups, because their own group is stronger or have more votes, so it's actually doable. They get a relief for the frustration by believing that they're doing something about their issue. It won't work though. It's similar to being bullied in school and then thinking it will help to take it out on the younger kids, instead of confronting the older bully.

It takes courage to fight upwards. Having been through unionisation efforts I can assure you that people living from one paycheck to the next are absolutely not courageous.

In regards to news, it's also a lot easier to simply choose the news that keeps presenting their existing belief.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 5 points 3 months ago

Yep, if you listen to guys like Steve Bannon talk, they sound like Marxists in their critiques of the system, up until the point where they have to identify the culprit. Instead of capitalists, they'll go and blame liberal elites, immigrants, etc.

[–] TBi@lemmy.world 75 points 3 months ago (6 children)

If illegal immigrants are taking all the jobs, why don’t we blame the people giving them jobs instead of the immigrants who are desperate?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 months ago

Because they have the capital.

load more comments (5 replies)

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 36 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but my problems are all because I have to see a brown person at work sometimes!

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 26 points 3 months ago

A quote often posted, but still works:

President Lyndon B. Johnson once said, "If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you."

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Tie housing costs to wages.

You wanna raise the rent? Go talk to the bosses and convince them to raise wages.

You wanna cut wages? Go talk to the landlords and get our rent down.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 23 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yes! I've been saying that forever. They say rent/mortgage shouldn't be more than 30% of your income. OK, make it so if you're working full-time, you can afford to live. Doesn't seem like a complicated, or controversial, take.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't know a single person who is only spending 30% on housing. It's more like 50% where I live. A lot of landlords have that dumb "rule" where you must make triple the cost of the lease per month after taxes but will look the other way when 4 people split the cost evenly for a 2 bedroom apartment so they can each make ends meet. Not a single one of them comes close to making 3x the rent each month but an over occupied apartment is more likely to remove a squeaky wheel who won't pay their share of the rent on their own without management having to get involved. Saves them the trouble of having to fight a long legal battle to evict a troublesome tenant.

Housing is so beyond fucked right now.

[–] LANIK2000@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

It really is... Me and my gf are two software developers living together, AKA income definitely isn't an issue. And yet almost half of our collective income goes to rent. To be fair we are renting a 3 room flat, and it was our choice to splurge a bit for now. But when I think about the future, starting a family, suddenly a flat like this doesn't seem as outrageous of a desire. To actually meet the 30%, we'd need a much smaller flat, each on our own would only afford a single room. But our incomes are comfortably above average, SO HOW THE FUCK DOES ANYBODY ELSE AFFORD ANYTHING AT ALL?!?

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

That is true, in many other countries. But the USA loves it's exceptionalism, and this is one of those fucked up examples of it.

(Of course other countries have their own issues.)

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I am more in favor of tying wages to inflation.

It's a day broader metric.... That way, slave wage companies can't screw their workers by charging out the ass for the services they're providing for next-to-nothing. Then the business owners can fight with everyone about keeping the inflation rates low so they can enjoy paying their workers less.

Let these two asshole groups duke it out amongst themselves.

[–] Specal@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Inflation however is a load of bollocks. It's inaccurate to measure and can be oh so easily manipulated.

House prices have been rising at a stupid rate for decades yet we had in the UK a typical inflation rate of... 0.1% for a decade whilst house prices out performed everything else because they just ignore it.

Like how if your favourite brand of cereal goes up 700%, that won't be included in inflation data they make the assumption you'd eat a generic brand instead that only went up 0.5%

It's all bollocks the lot of it, remove money it's not worth anything anyway

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Remember if your yearly raise isn’t more than inflation, you’ve lost money.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 3 months ago

Anyone whose income depends on harming others has an incentive to distract the people they’re harming. Point a finger at any out-group & that job is done. Immigrants are the easiest out group to post a finger at

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

"[the landlord leaves the worker] with the smallest share with which the tenant can content himself without being a loser, and the landlord seldom means to leave him any more." - Adam Smith

[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Consider the incestuous circle of ownership of the big 3 asset managers (BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard) and despair.

https://youtu.be/ZxZO0jd8VoU?si=DtJkReq2Ft4B_AXF

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

That explains why the oligarchs are trying so hard to get Kamala to fire FTC leadership

[–] aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 3 months ago

Elon musk is an immigrant.

Mudrock family are immigrants, also were in UK while publishing xenophobia.

Shiity people often abuse the USA's liberties in bad faith and prosper.

But govt people allowed the mergers until the media are mostly owned by them, soon there will be ONE major grocery chain in USA, apparently the Loblaw imbroglio is invisible from Wash DC, and buying and selling personal data is commonplace, not even taxed much less protected.

Those Pogo comics of them going downhill out of control are from the 50s, that pure copper penny still hasn't dropped.

Who got bailed out in 2008? And who bailed them out?

[–] LibreHans@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Ah yes, let's attack our neighbors who try to save their money, and let's ignore the bankers and politicians who created the system that incentivizes this behavior.

[–] Specal@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago (14 children)

This whole argument of peoples pension funds being the largest shareholders in a company is bizarre. https://www.blackrock.com/institutions/en-us/insights/public-pensions-survey pensions are owning less and less of the stock markets every year, become less and less relevant. Institutions like blackrock however are growing. Consistently.

Like mate your neighbour Barry isn't calling into the shareholders meeting to criticise the CEO for paying $0.05 an hour over minimum wage the the receptionist.

load more comments (14 replies)

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. Stockholders are not the problem - corporate concentration of wealth and power is the problem. Attacking me for having a 401k is just crabs-in-a-bucket mentality.

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago (5 children)

No one is attacking you for your 401k... The problem is that the richest 10% own 93% of all stocks, and the 1% own 54%. Your 401k almost certainly falls into that 7% the peasants "own". When we point a finger at "stock holders" we're talking about the relatively small group that owns everything and would rather kill everyone than share the wealth equitably.

load more comments (5 replies)

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

No one is pointing the finger at regular people... The problem is that the richest 10% own 93% of all stocks, and the 1% own 54%. The 1% often IS the bankers, and they did create the system, and they paid the politicians to pass it. You're just muddying the waters.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You all are fundamentally missing something with real estate pricing increasing, and that's how it's used for money laundering.

You know how you can sell a piece of art to someone for any price and how that gets used for money laundering? Well, the rich do that with houses and property too. Hint: a lot of real estate agents aren't really working as real estate agents. They are someone's escort or drug dealer etc who gets payment in the form of a cut of the property they "sold," but in reality was a pre-planned transaction that didn't really need real estate agents to facilitate.

So basically they are subsidizing illegal activity with our properties.

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ummm... What? Proof of this? Would be pretty wild if true.

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Oh, they talk about it in the documentary Active Measures (2018) when discussing Donald Trump doing it with commercial real estate and iirc, the mob/mafia. McCain and Hillary Clinton are in that doc. I'm looking for a link to the full documentary and will update this comment if I find it.

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] UsefulInfoPlz@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Don’t forget the massive property tax increases and home insurance increases. Both have doubled in less than 10 years. At least they have here in FL with our wack job governor.

[–] Djtecha@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes but that also has a lot to do with insurance companies finally using climate data for their rates.

[–] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

And the lack of state income tax. The tourist taxes only go so far, they've got to make that money somewhere, property tax is one of the places Florida balances the books.

[–] hate2bme@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

One of my best friends is an illegal immigrant and I've realized that he is here doing what I'm doing. Trying to get by and provide for his family. If the tables were turned I'd do the same and if all these people against them say they wouldn't, they are full of shit. Actually, there's such shitty people that they probably wouldn't anyway.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

In some countries (including the USA), immigration is mostly a civil issue, and most "illegal immigration" is actually not illegal!

[–] VubDapple@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

These two groups are the same people.

load more comments