A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
Damn, I scrolled through comments upvoting interesting comments and only after that did I find out that I was supposed to use downvotes as a part of the game. And there I was confused why there's ao much downvotes. Lol
Never have I ever read the rules of this game.
Never have i ever been between jobs since starting work after leaving school
Never have I ever broken a bone.
Me neither. Not for lack of trying, just luck.
meta: I think you should invert the rules, so that if you have done it, you downvote. The winner with the most votes is then the rarest of them all
If you have done it you upvote. If you have not done it you downvote.
The point is to be the person with the most upvotes because you've not done a thing that most people have done.
That's what OP is saying. The wording could be clearer.
Essentially, if you can relate to what the comment says, then downvote.
Can someone explain this to me?
if you have done that thing, upvote it. If you have not done that thing, downvote it.
So if someone says "never have I ever eaten food", then I, a food eater, upvote it, right?
I think you and I share the same mind, but different eyes.
If someone says "I never shot a hippo", then right now I will down vote (because I haven't shot a hippo), so then if it gets upvoted.....
OHhhhhh. It just clicked for me. Yep, you're right. It makes sense
~~Either my reading comprehension has been turned to dust or you didnt read it~~
2: Read the other posts, if you have done that thing, upvote it.
~~As in: Upvote, I have not done that thing~~
Edit: Seems like I can't read. I think it's called double negation?
The problem is that the "thing" is either:
Never have I ever eaten lobster