Depends if it's full or not. I live in a city with decent public bus transport. Outside of rush hour those buses are just mostly empty and sometimes we have a grid lock of empty buses.
Fuck Cars
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
The bus has 33 people on it? Even buses in Korea don't get that packed in most places.
Russian here, the main routes are always packed here (esp during rush hour)
Doesn't matter, if it was carrying 25% of the people that the cars are it'd be baller.
In my experience (lived in four countries, ~30 cities / towns), public transport just feels unsafe. It’s always a choice between crazies shouting, groups of teenagers playfighting and blasting their mobile phones on full volume or just the good old rapey stare from strangers. I’d rather not be exposed to all the worst elements of society at close quarters in a metal tube I can’t escape from.
City seems to have some bias, if mostly the worst elements drive public transport.
I talk as a person who rode the bicycle and walked more than driven a car that in a typical city centre designed for cars I prefer to live poluting with my car rather than die hit by one while riding the bicycle in a hurry to work.
Sure, but I'm not going to get on any conveyance with a bunch of strangers if I can avoid it.
Walk > Cycle > Tram > Train > Car > Bus.
Buses always seem like the worst possible option from a personal standpoint.
I don't feel like you can rank all of these on the same level, they aim to solve different problems in different contexts.
I'm not going to walk across the country, I'm going to take a train if possible, or a plane if the trains don't exist or I'm on a really tight schedule. But I won't take a train, a plane, or even a bus to go a couple blocks to the corner store, I'll walk. If it's storming, however, I might take the bus or a tram despite the short distance and the wait for it to show up.
If I'm going eight blocks to a doctor's appointment and it's nice out, I might bike, unless it's raining literal cats and dogs, because then I'll absolutely leave super extra early and walk so I can pet each and every one of them on the way (and still be late, because priorities).
If I'm going to visit a nearby city, I might take a train or a bus, but if I'm moving to a nearby city, I'm going to rent a moving truck and drive. It's all contextual.
From my experience bus is carrying just the driver