this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
1112 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

58492 readers
3965 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"Fidelity is currently valuing X at about $9.4 billion"

I found this funny.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 268 points 5 days ago (10 children)

Honestly terrifying that they still think it is worth that much.

[–] hushable@lemmy.world 115 points 5 days ago (2 children)

they still own the twitter trademark, that might be their biggest asset

[–] SkavarSharraddas@gehirneimer.de 51 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Since they don't seem to care about it, start using "tweet" for every social media post to devalue them further.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 53 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Tweets are a specific type of a microblog post you do on twitters. Have you tried tweeting, make your own twitter at https://joinmastodon.org/ today!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jonne@infosec.pub 62 points 5 days ago (4 children)

If someone were to buy it, ban the Nazis and get advertisers to come back it's still salvageable, I guess. The longer Musk owns it, the bigger the chance is that it'll become the next MySpace.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 140 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Musk did not buy this as an investment. He bought it to flip elections and manipulate public opinion.

Tesla is writing him a check that will cover the entire purchase price, and Saudi Arabia and Russia will pay the operating costs.

Active users are what matters; if they lost 75% of their users then I'm paying attention.

[–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure he gave an outlandish bid for Twitter to manipulate it's stock prices when he pulled put, but he was sued into following through.

I don't think he ever wanted to buy it, or at least he wanted to crash it's value to come back and buy it on the cheap.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 22 points 5 days ago

I think you're giving the guy too much credit. Sometimes things are as they seen. He just didn't like the moderation scheme on Twitter, made a gesture buying it, fumbled a little bit and overbid, then after having been forced to acquire it tried to turn it into something closer to what he wanted it to be.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think it’s even pettier than that. He’s the loud guy on the forum who literally bought the site so he could be admin.

[–] reka@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Honestly, everyone needs to listen to the episode of Search Engine about Elon. It’s such a clear narrative of what happened between the Iron Man cameo and now. It’s pure hubris - someone who is very unlikable desperately hungry for love to the point where his brain bust a fuse.

[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago

Aren't 75% of the users Russian bots? Lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 171 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (11 children)

And yet, he's still one of the what, 5 richest people on the planet?

He doesn't give a shit, and neither should you (as nice as the schadenfreude might feel). He got something worth more to him than plain old money - an established propaganda platform, which he is using as he intended - to war monger and otherwise interfere in politics to ensure fascism progresses as fast as he can help it. The "dent" (more like a surface scratch) it put in his finances is completely invisible and irrelevant to him.

And it should be to you, too.

He is NEVER going to end up without means or power, not even fucking close, unless we take them from him, and abolish the system that encouraged and enabled him to amass them in the first place.

[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 37 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (7 children)

What is completely wild to me is that there are only 4 main apps: Reddit, twitter, instagram, and Facebook. Almost every public conversation happens on one of those platforms. And of those four platforms, one of them was bought by one singular person. Some people just don’t get the absolute scale of how much one person can just buy of our communities.

Like it or not, there are businesses on Twitter. Celebrities are easy to reach and talk to. Even companies use Twitter for support. News outlets post there. It’s a whole community. Was it a bit toxic? Yeah. But it wouldn’t have mattered. One guy bought it.

Similar to what you said, if you were to run the numbers on this I’m pretty sure owning twitter to Elon is not much different than owning a cable subscription to your average family. A whole community of tens of millions of people bought by one person and its success doesn’t matter. Capitalism is broken. And if you think that’s bad, imagine how he can affect your government when a Supreme Court justice goes for a small small fraction of the price..

Edit: I did the math and it turns out that twitter has lost so much money that this is no longer a cable subscription. It’s about a 6% yearly loss to Elons net worth, dependent on his current stock values. Which means it’s not cable, but about the cost the average person spends on food in a year ($10,000 yearly cost to a 200k net worth). Still insane.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 35 points 4 days ago (5 children)

its worth comes from being able to influence world politics. Does he seem like someone who cares or needs money?

[–] vvvvv@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Twitter currently has $1.5 billion/year deficit which is a lot, even for Musk, to bankroll.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 days ago

that brightens my day a little to hear

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

True, but that power is also diminished greatly as more and more regular users abandon the site. No eyes on the propaganda makes it worth a lot less.

[–] kobra@lemm.ee 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yeah I’m sure I’m not the norm but I’m actually shocked when I see companies advertising their talent’s twitter accounts on tv broadcasts. I truly can’t believe that site is still mainstream after everything that’s happened.

Idk then I look over and see trump as a presidential candidate and ugh… I guess I’m just still not comfortable/accepting of how far off the rails things have gone 🙁

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] uebquauntbez@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

A real socialist! Took money from the rich to give it to the poor (minded). /s

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

My first thought is 'I can't wait for it to turn zero' but then I realize that 79% decline from 44 billion still means it is worth 9.24 billion.

And that is still a shitload of money.

[–] Benchamoneh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago

But on the plus side, this idiot is 34.76 billion poorer

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 62 points 5 days ago (11 children)

We knew this was going to happen before he made the purchase.

Everyone said, the best way for Elon to keep his money was to change very little, or even take a hands-off approach.

Masnick suggested this would happen

It was that and so much worse. Moral of the story: Running a huge social media service is hard. Maybe don't assume that because you're a billionaire you're the best at doing stuff.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I mean the people at Twitter were very happy to sell it off. Remember how they actually sued to force him to go through with the deal and succeeded in stopping him from backing out?

Even if he’d managed it as well as the prior stewards, it was always a losing business.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Meanwhile he is on track to become the world's first trillionaire

I think the purchase was more about welding power than any financial gain

[–] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 17 points 5 days ago

He tried to back out, I don't think any of this was about anything. He's just a dick with a weird sense of humor.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 15 points 4 days ago

Twitter was useful.

X is just useful idiots at this point.

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 27 points 4 days ago (2 children)

And may it continue to crash and burn. It’s just 4 chan at this point.

[–] kusari@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 days ago

It’s like 4chan but it didn’t know where the line was for the amount of right wing people to be on a social media and ran a marathon

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 73 points 5 days ago

Elon Musk's greatest personal achievement has been his tireless work and incredible effort toward disproving the myth of Billionaire Exceptionalism.

[–] bender223@lemmy.today 8 points 3 days ago (3 children)

They should tweet that

But then , they'll get banned 😛

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It was never worth 44 billion USD

False, because someone paid that much for Twitter.

It was worth 44bn to it's former owners.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 63 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Couldn't have happened to a douchier bag.

[–] GeneralInterest@lemmy.world 43 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The funny part was when he said he was a free speech absolutist, but then he started restricting the free speech of people he doesn't like

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] istoff@lemmy.world 40 points 5 days ago (6 children)

If they influence the election to their desired outcome, then the value won't matter. The damage will have been done.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 44 points 5 days ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] erenkoylu@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 28 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Didn't he pay too much for it in the first place?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tabular@lemmy.world 37 points 5 days ago

I just checked and it's worth nothing to anyone important.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 26 points 5 days ago

Posts about value are ads. Stop give exposure to this guy or his companies

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 35 points 5 days ago (13 children)

Elon is a genius at losing money.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 28 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Musk is and always has been an incompetent yet lucky scammer.

Twitter will be bankrupt within two years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Let’s everyone point and laugh. It humbles people like him, right?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 27 points 5 days ago

How to become a billionaire: Start with 54 billion

load more comments
view more: next ›