this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
236 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19233 readers
2173 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump is already claiming the vice presidential debate between J.D. Vance and Tim Walz is “rigged.”

Donald Trump is already explaining away J.D. Vance’s performance during the vice presidential debate, and it hasn’t even happened yet. 

During an interview on Fox Business Monday, Kellyanne Conway asked Trump whether he would consider doing another debate. 

The former president tried to downplay his outright refusal to go head-to-head with Kamala Harris again, and implied that Vance would face the same treatment Tuesday night.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 62 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Same attitude too. Old Walter Trump

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I hate trump as much as anyone but objectively doesn't he look like he aged like 10 years the last month or so?

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

Keep it up, Donald!

[–] Lichtblitz@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago

And whoever is way up his ass, is also a racist climate change denier. (Or has that changed in the last decade or so that I wouldn't watch these shows?)

[–] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 56 points 2 months ago

Concepts of a plan for preparation.

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 44 points 2 months ago

Tests are indeed rigged in favor of those that study.

Studying is when you read, analyze, and memorize information not when you sharpie a map to prove you're a big smart science man.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 26 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The funny thing is there was an episode of The West Wing on this subject.

iirc Leo was running for Veep and had his buddies in the press put out a ton of stories about how bad he was at debates. When Leo proved to be adept he got a much bigger boost because he was perceived as the underdog.

But I don't think that's the case here. Vance isn't ready to go toe to toe with a career politician who is getting help from people who worked with experts like Obama

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Walz could just do a 90 min debate where he just explains how to do general car maintenance or lawn care and he would destroy this lying anal fissure.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"CBS has asked each candidate to fact check the other. In interest of saving time, I'll just repeat all the times Mr. Vance and Mr. Trump have been caught lying. Let's start with the Haitian dog BBQ's and move backwards. Or would you prefer starting with Mr. Trump's promise to have Mexico pay for the Wall and move forward?"

[–] DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Boom! Fucking nailed it man. Well said, that would be awesome!

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

And then for every question, totally ignore the question and just keep listing lies.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

West Wing has done irreparable brain damage to libs across the country. It's why Obama's advisors told him to give republicans half the discretionary budget when they had a supermajority and didn't need a single republican vote, compromised/means tested every bill he promoted, and went with the bloodiest possible option in every foreign policy decision. In an episode of West Wing, all that compromise and appealing the the better nature of the opposition would reward you. In reality, it just demotivates your base and lets the opposition demand even more.

[–] CaptainKickass@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

Drumpf knows a thing or two about losing debates

[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

When you're MAGA, reality is rigged

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Vance is a soulless douche nozzle, but he’s a trained lawyer. I think he’ll hold his own just fine. I don’t think he’ll “beat” Waltz, but he’s probably not going to foam at the mouth over crowd sizes and pets being eaten.

In the end, does a VP debate matter?

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

It will if Vance shows up with an entire new personality and Walz shows up with filed teeth and a severed baby arm.

[–] bender223@lemmy.today 21 points 2 months ago

for someone who claims to be a winner, he sure does a lot of loser talk 🤣

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 months ago

Like father like son.

Go ahead, Vance - lose the shit out of that debate!

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I could see Walz winning.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

That's because he's a loser with a loser mentality.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

If I didn't know any of the facts involved and was only going by emotion, Vance is ahead. Not stomping ass, but well enough to side me with Trump if I was already inclined so.

And this is exactly where liberals fail, over and over and over. We think our facts are somehow going to overrule emotions. Idiots and failures.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Trump was worrying as he knows how to read a room and had some good lines in previous debates (who built the cages). Zero chance JD Vance manages to be normal for an entire hour. He's probably got Laura Loomer prepping him.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

Well even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago

New Republic - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for New Republic:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://newrepublic.com/post/186555/donald-trump-jd-vance-preparing-lose-vp-debate
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support