this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
984 points (99.4% liked)

Memes

45387 readers
1931 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Epzillon@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago

Not even kidding, my dad watches YouTube on this smart TV and when an ad pops up he covers his eyes and screams until he finds the mute button. He then keeps covering his eyes until he can fully skip the ads.

[–] SSJMarx@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago

The upside to using ad blockers - no ads!

The downside to using ad blockers - not knowing what any of the movies currently in theaters are.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 10 points 3 days ago

Yes, I someones forget how people live.
Disgusting.

[–] limitsomething@lemmy.ml 31 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I remembered a scene of a black mirror episode: if the person looked away the ads will stop until the person watch it again and it's unavoidable ... I wonder if this will be a reality one day

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Yes, the technology to do this is here, and they're just waiting for the consumer to be able to put up with it.

[–] emmy67@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This is why I just set up a media server at home.

It's mine, you can't pump it full of ads. All the media is mine and those companies can go fuck themselves.

Sail those seas folks

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't worry your TV will just hijack the HDMI signal to inject its own ads

[–] emmy67@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Not if isn't connected to a network. 😈

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They know if they do that people will just disable their cameras or put tape over it like they already do. If they make it so you can't disable the camera without losing functionality then people won't buy the product.

If they try to push it by making a gentleman's agreement with their competitors to make all tvs or phones use camera eye contact during ads well have to have fight back with more ad blockers and such.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I mean the concept is pretty simple, all they have to do is make whatever the content it is not play without the verification.

Now I do have to say, it does come down to what is the system we do want? We can agree we don't want intrusive ads. We can say that the paid for services are too expensive. But at the end of the day when we refuse to pay for the content, and then bypass the ads, we do leave content creation in a rough spot. We've kind of reached a point where we need a new system. Yet all we seem to do is try and find ways to break the existing one.

[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago

The problem is that ad revenue brings in more money than subscription models ever can. So they're either super expensive because the company is accustomed to the high profits of ads, OR they inevitably end up slipping ads into the paids versions too.

Youtube has become this venus fly trap where content creators get exploited. They exist on the site solely to draw in viewers to show ads to. YouTube doesn't really care about the content or their creators(they don't care about paying them either since there's endless accounts) their primary function is to sell ads. That's it.

With data harvesting and personalized ads they basically print money for themselves. Now each ad spot will show something different to each person, meaning they are getting paid by multiple(potentially hundreds or thousands) of companies for each available ad location. They don't care if you buy the product because they got paid the second that ad popped up on your screen.

Ad based revenue is creating a huge fucking mess for everyone.

[–] limitsomething@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Reading your reply made me think ... it's possible that implying such technology might help rising Free & Open Source culture more ... given that FOSS apps are usually ad-free and with no tracking

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 10 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Honestly the best thing about FOSS is that money isn't driving all the decisions. Most open-source projects are built because the dev just wants to build something cool or useful, or they're trying to solve specific problems. Most individual devs don't really care if their user count goes up every quarter.
Personally I've been maintaining a chrome extension for about 10 years, and it's sat happily with about 7000 users that entire time. I built it because I wanted to use it, and I've declined several offers to buy the extension and monetize it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago

Please drink a verification can

[–] Nexy@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Put a pi-hole in my rooter filtering all adds of all webs and apps was the best thing I ever did.

[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

put a pi-hole in my rooter

Giggity What would be the definition if it was in the urban dictionary?

[–] Nexy@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Allot of my phrases tend to be like this without noticing... Its like a power I think

[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago

It really is, and I hope you never ever lose that power.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 72 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I use an add blocker to such an extent im horrified every time I'm on an unfamiliar device and have to deal with copious adds.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 4 days ago

I can't even imagine raw-dogging the internet like that...

[–] bob_lemon@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Basically me every time I open a website on my work laptop, where I cannot add browser extensions because of IT policies.

I honestly cannot fathom why large companies don't include at least simple adblockers in their browser configurations. I don't even need to block youtube ads, the banners on stackoverflow are bass enough). Would probably save fairly significant amounts of bandwidth, too.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 1 points 19 hours ago

because then things would just shut down... The poor suckers that don't use adblockers are what pay the bandwidth and hosting costs for those of us that do. If it becomes the default, things would either shutdown or go paywall.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I’m to the point that if whatever I’m watching/doing pops an ad at me, I reflexively make a snap judgement on whether I want to continue watching/doing whatever it is. Often the answer is ‘no’ and I’ll just bail entirely.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 48 points 4 days ago (12 children)

I remember life without adblockers. Back when they were not needed, because web sited did not have ads.

[–] nastyyboi@lemmy.world 53 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Those were one of the later plagues, too.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I, too, have a sore back when I awake.

[–] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Ah yes, the less than three years before banner ads showed up, and exploded, everywhere

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (6 children)

did you use the internet in '92 or something? because even in mid to late 90s the ads were so cancerous that pop-up blocking eventually became a standard feature of browsers before ad blockers were even a thing.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

My first contact with the web (I had been in the internet for some time already) was when a collegue at university told me about the Arena browser, and this new system, "like Gopher, but with Hypertext and pictures". And yes, I've seen the CERN website, served from Tim Barners-Lee's NeXT cube, too.

So yes, I knew the web before there were ads, the internet when services were normally open to all sides, and when people on the internet that were actually much smarter than average.

[–] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Seriously. Someone never clicked on the "you are an idiot" popup that auto-played music, moved around the screen, prevented task manager from opening and cloned itself if it was closed.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 22 points 4 days ago (5 children)

On my Roku TV I can't block ads, when they play I mute the TV and look away. I am absolutely the level of autistic that I think I'm "winning" by doing this.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

If I'm watching YouTube on my TV, I mute it when anything longer than a 5 second ad comes on. If what I'm watching is less than 10 minutes, I'll just back out and start in again, usually it will come up without the ad, then seek to where I left off. Although oftentimes lately, I'll be watching a 5 minute video, and I'll get 1 minute in and get hit with an unskippable 2 minute ad, I just quit YouTube for the day.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sakychu@lemmy.world 40 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Camara zooms out revealing a third guy looking down into his face youtube requiring a Webcam so they can track your eyes

[–] pemptago@lemmy.ml 20 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I'm convinced Mark Zuckerberg had a wet dream about pupil tracking when he bought Oculus.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

He saw that Black Mirror episode and found it to be aspirational.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dgmib@lemmy.world 36 points 4 days ago (6 children)

After going nuclear against ad blockers, at some point google is going to introduce a new “feature” where YouTube uses AI with your phone’s camera to automatically pause videos when you look away from your phone.

Then they’ll make it so you have to buy a subscription to turn it off during ads.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

writers of black mirror's 15 million merits laughing crying maniacally in the distance

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I have adblock on my Mac, but not on the PS5. Whenever I watch YouTube on my TV via PS5, I have to open and close videos sometimes 10 or 15 times before they just play the video I've clicked on and not some obnoxious 45 second long advert for some bullshit I don't want and won't use. Honestly not sure why YouTube finds it so hard to play the video I clicked on and not random other videos. I also tend to stop watching vids as soon as an ad break happens.

I work with a marketing department full time and they're exactly as annoying as expected, always pissing about on tiktok or Instagram creating shit that nobody could possibly feasibly care about.

Is there an alternative to YouTube on PS5 that doesn't have adverts? Or is there some way to get adblocking on there?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 4 days ago

Easy fix: HDMI cable from the laptop to your TV to watch youtube.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 13 points 4 days ago

uBlock origin carries my browser ngl

[–] 200ok@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 16 points 4 days ago (2 children)

That would be a point where I would just never use YouTube again.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›