this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
626 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19026 readers
2176 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A nine-minute, unedited, undercover interview with Roger Stone revealed some of the MAGA ally’s more disturbing goals for a second Trump administration.

The covert recording of a discussion between Stone and an undercover journalist at a meet and greet in Jacksonville, Florida, on August 4, published by documentarian Lauren Windsor, caught Stone admitting live on camera that he already intends to send “armed guards to dispute the election in Detroit” and to imprison “former Attorney General Bill Barr if Trump returns to power.”

Under the guise of discussing a far-right program to get more like-minded people back into the federal government, Stone shared his disdain for Barr, deriding him as a “traitorous piece of human garbage.” He also lamented that, while president, “Donald Trump never controlled the Justice Department.”


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

(page 2) 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Sounds like treason with the penalty of death if I recall correctly.

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Lets try and guess it y'all!

Rodger Stone in a top hat stands in front of elections office in Pennsylvania as he enters everyone counting ballots runs out of the building. The office combusts. Rodger Stone exits the building to Kamala Harris and Tim Walz. In unison, "Rodger Stone?! Again?!? How could we have guessed this would happen?!"

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Is it a video of "anything he's ever said or done"?

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump can't even spell "Justice Department".

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Some are calling it "juicetice" even, we say "juicy juice" sometimes you know we call it even - we really do folks and you know that and I know that and you know that, okay? Romanians are reaping, okay they are reaping and they are raping the antelopes and the democrats are just laughing at us folks... And if you elect Harris the hairy butt Harris, and some are calling her that, you hear it's being said, I don't necessarily think she's a hairy butt Harris, but maybe she is if they're saying it, okay... Oh shit, a balloon!"

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Lot going on there! Let's stop and appreciate the interviewer. He came off as a passionate and "educated" supporter, didn't press too hard, well handled. LOL, and despite the gay lisp, Stone thought they were on the same side. C'mon, you gotta be suspicious of a gay man pumping you for answers on how to throw an election for Trump. Stone was certainly drunk.

One thing he was honest about: Those 62 cases of election fraud were not heard. And no evidence was brought before the courts. Because every one of Trump's lawyers, when asked if they were alleging election interference and/or if they had evidence, bailed. (OK, I think one was heard and Trump got 6 votes somewhere in PA.) Throw that at your election denier friends and family. Pretty fucking damning when even Trump appointed judges wouldn't even hear the cases.

Another solid Stone point; It's not about the federal government, it's about the states. These people aren't stupid, they know how the game is played. I believe a man once said, "All politics is local."

Anyhow, I'll vote in person. And armed. Y'all can count on the "authorities" to do the right thing, but I'll have serious questions for any red hats milling around.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›