this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
1046 points (78.5% liked)

Political Memes

5494 readers
2031 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zante@lemmy.wtf 8 points 1 month ago

Must we endure this witless partisan frothing ?

We get it, you’re on the team, now make something funny or go away.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago (10 children)

This.

So many conversations had where people talk about kamela being a war criminal who loves genocide because she doesn't nuke Israel.

People need to get a grip and get a basic understanding that the world is just not that simple.

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago

People aren't asking her to nuke israel, they're asking her to stop funding Israel.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Commiunism@lemmy.wtf 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

If US stopped sending billions in weapons for Israel to kill whoever their current target is, that would be a huge blow to the whole 'conflict' (as in, a colonial genocide). Neither of the candidates are willing to do anything of the sort though - Kamala has pledged to continue supporting Israel while Trump has pledged to give all the support Israel needs to 'finish the job quickly'.

And while yes, there's nuance to be found like with literally everything in the world, it's not a reason to dismiss any criticisms thrown at your preferred candidate.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Who transcribed this? Seriously, people...

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Imagine a scenario with multiple political parties competing to defeat the Republicans. With more representative electoral systems, voters could choose any candidate they prefer, ensuring that even if their choice doesn’t win, their vote can still be counted against the republican party with no spoiler effect. Since voting methods are determined at the state level, we don’t need to wait for federal changes; some states have already implemented electoral reform. Alaska recently picked a more moderate conservative over Sarah Palin because of Ranked Choice voting

Who would oppose having multiple chances to take power from the Republican Party? The Democratic Party would. In states they control, they could replace First Past The Post voting with an electoral system without a spoiler effect. Yet year after year, election after election, the democrats sit on their hands and do nothing about FPTP voting.

Democrats frequently acknowledge the shortcomings of FPTP voting, and have done so for longer than I’ve been alive. Just mention voting for a third party to any Democrat, and they’ll readily express their awareness of the flaws in the voting system used by most states. Comments for articles about the Green Party will further illustrate their understanding of this issue.

The Democrats seem to prefer the country balancing over a fire pit of fascism rather than truly competing for our votes. Party over country at all costs.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›