this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
661 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59731 readers
2931 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We’ve been anticipating it for years, and it’s finally happening. Google is finally killing uBlock Origin – with a note on their web store stating that the extension will soon no longer be available because it “doesn’t follow the best practices for Chrome extensions”.

Now that it is finally happening, many seem to be oddly resigned to the idea that Google is taking away the best and most powerful ad content blocker available on any web browser today, with one article recommending people set up a DNS based content blocker on their network 😒 – instead of more obvious solutions.

I may not have blogged about this but I recently read an article from 1999 about why Gopher lost out to the Web, where Christopher Lee discusses the importance of the then-novel term “mind share” and how it played an important part in dictating why the web won out. In my last post, I touched on the importance of good information to democracies – the same applies to markets (including the browser market) – and it seems to me that we aren’t getting good information about this topic.

This post is me trying to give you that information, to help increase the mind share of an actual alternative. Enjoy!

(page 6) 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GeneralInterest@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I might try uBlock Origin Lite, then if it doesn't work very well then maybe I'll just use Firefox

I guess Google are betting that only a small segment of power users will switch to Firefox, while the mass of ordinary people won't be bothered enough to switch.

[–] Khrux@ttrpg.network -1 points 1 month ago

This is definitely a selfish opinion but people who block adverts or torrent being a small percentage of users can be a good thing.

If they lose even 5% of their userbase to Firefox over this decision, they'll find a way to make grand modifications to Google search and YouTube in a manner that stops you blocking ads from alternative browsers, and while I'm happy swapping to an alternative search engine, it'll definitely becometedious to sidestep Google's gaze.

But if it's 0.1% of people who swap due to this, and Google already don't care about the small percentage they lose to Firefox then I would rather sit under the radar and not be cracked down on.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 1 month ago (10 children)

I think Brave said they arent affected by this

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] geography082@lemm.ee -4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

People you can still block the shit of using DNS Adblockers . There are a some free like Mullvad DNS and Adguard.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] csm10495@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I still hope as part of the antitrust ruling, they rip chrome from Google and undo this crap.

I've had good luck with uBlock Lite.

(Yes I could swap browsers but nah).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LoveSausage@discuss.tchncs.de -5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children)

I just use DNS or VPN for adblocking , no need for browser addons

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›