this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
45 points (94.1% liked)

Star Trek

10608 readers
45 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


New to Star Trek and wondering where to start?


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episodes, as well as previews for upcoming episodes. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
11-21 LD 5x06 "Of Gods and Angles"
11-28 LD 5x07 "Fully Dilated"
12-05 LD 5x08 "Upper Decks"
12-12 LD 5x09 "Fissue Quest"
12-19 LD 5x10 "The New Next Generation"

Episode Discussion Archive


In Production

Strange New Worlds (2025)

Section 31 (2025-01-24)

Starfleet Academy (TBA)

In Development

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.


Allied Discord Server


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] natecox@programming.dev 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)

No.

Bring back my hopeful vision of the future Star Trek, I’m all done with this new wave.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So don't watch it. And you think strange new worlds is bad??

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Did you even watch the movie? I swear half the people on here are bots.

[–] natecox@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

Did I even watch the movie which hasn’t come out yet? I’m pretty sure I know which of us is a bot.

[–] SeikoAlpinist@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I was kind of hoping that after 2023, she would decide to not do this. I think Michelle Yeoh is fantastic, generational actress; but I'm highly skeptical of recent Star Trek works. She is by far the biggest name to return to the franchise.

Hopefully, they have an excellent story to match.

[–] SteleTrovilo@beehaw.org 1 points 1 month ago

She played Georgiou across three seasons of Star Trek; what would be her motivation to stop in 2023?

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You wanted her to not take a job cause some star trek fans didn't want this?

[–] SeikoAlpinist@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago

No, I didn't want a dark Section 31 series based on the Discovery/Picard "Dark Trek" writing style.

Michelle Yeoh winning the Oscar was an easy cop out. Now she's in another league in terms of salary, and Paramount can't afford to pay her for a streaming series. Both sides go their separate ways and the idea is dropped.

Fortunately for us, she loves the character and wanted to do at least one final act. So I guess the compromise is the movie instead of the series.

And that is cause for optimism because it likely means the script was good enough to draw her back, and concise enough that the Section 31 thing won't be dragged out.

Hey, we're finally getting a new Trek movie, and it has a big name actress behind it.

[–] capt_kafei@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Does this mean it's not showing in theaters on release, only on Paramount+? That's a strange decision. I assume they're hoping new people will sign up for Paramount+ to see it, but showing it in theaters could get a lot of new people interested in star trek who then might be motivated to sign up and check out the shows.

Also I was looking forward to seeing it on the big screen. Oh well.

[–] mrcleanup@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I just watched a fascinating documentary on Star Trek and they talked about how paramount kept trying to launch their own network on the back of Star Trek as it's cash cow and how they kept failing because it was all they had on it and not enough viewers.

Problem solved by making all the different kinds of shows into Star Trek, I guess, but how are they going to grow a fan base if it's all locked behind a paywall that only people who already love it will pay to get through?

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're talking about the old UPN network?

[–] mrcleanup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

And now Paramount+. Even now their strategy seems to be to fill it with Star Trek and wait for the cash to roll in.

Yeah, this one has always been slated as a Paramount+ exclusive.

[–] CCMan1701A@startrek.website 1 points 1 month ago

Nice, been waiting for this as I abandoned Discovery once her story was over. I view it as a TV movie or basically a long double episode.

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think I may have just jizzed in my pants

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You know, modern medicine has made great strides when it comes to issues like this.