this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
1292 points (99.2% liked)

Memes

45772 readers
1750 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You will go straight to jail 😑😑😑

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 30p87@feddit.org 139 points 1 month ago (4 children)

12ft.io almost never works for me tbh.

Also, appending before something is called prepending, similar to how a prefix after something is a suffix.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 69 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Archive.is is definitely not an alternative that people should use in this situation

[–] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Nor archive.ph, which appears to be the same site? Idk how that works. Definitely not a site anyone should go to, though.

[–] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 month ago

Nor archive.md nor archive.today, which appear to be run by the same rogue actors and serve the same content as archive.is and archive.ph. Beware.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 19 points 1 month ago

I'd like to prepend that this dude is correct.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Bertuccio@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I got my prependix taken out as a kid due to an infection.

load more comments (6 replies)

Yup. They went full OG AdBlock and got WaPo and other major publications to prevent them from working.

You can mimic what they did by adding the Google Crawler user agent to your browser but I just use archive.is

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 88 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Definitely don't use uBlock Origin's zapper mode to get rid of elements on the page that are blocking your view.

[–] janNatan@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 month ago

Disabling JavaScript through ublock origin also does the same (horrible) thing, frequently.

[–] Furball@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I’ve used ublock for years and only recently discovered the zapper and it’s my new favorite thing on the internet

[–] datavoid@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

I don't generally use it, but safari got this baked in recently

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I often forget YouTube shorts are a thing because i zapped them away.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

cocks the element zapper Say hello to my little friend!

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I have been using inspect element to manually remove ads and other annoying things

Thanks for reminding me that i can just use ublock origin!

[–] don@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

^ This person adblocks

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] QuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyz 55 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And God forbid if someone uses archiving sites like archive.is!

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Truly awful. How will the news megacorp get its money? You wouldn't steal the information required for you to be aware of world events? Right?

[–] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

<please sign up for Β£2.99/month to read cRazi_man's comment and receive an invite to the Discord channel>

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Metostopholes@midwest.social 44 points 1 month ago

Back during prohibition in the US, there was a product called Vine-Glo that was a brick of grape concentrate. It came with a warning: "After dissolving the brick in a gallon of water, do not place the liquid in a jug away in the cupboard for twenty days, because then it would turn into wine."

[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Doesn't NYT cut off most of the article now? I used to just be able to disable JS but that didn't work anymore last I checked.

[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (13 children)

I use this extension and it lets me bypass pretty much every paywall including NYT's

[–] hunt4peas@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

Best extension along with uBlock Origins!

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Yeah the article stub doesn't link to the article. It links to a login flow with the article id. If you go directly to the article you get redirected if you don't have a session.

It's incredibly easy to make an impossible to get around paywall. Porn has done it since the Internet existed.

In this very particular situation I'm glad most companies are lazy and stupid.

I don't particularly care if a company does pay only content. I think its legitimately ok. I hate companies that don't make you pay enough for the service to cover their costs thus leading to complete enshitifaction.

[–] ChuckEffingNorris@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I thought the issue was they wanted search engines to be able to see the content, but not non paying viewers? Hence slightly shitty paywalls.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 24 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I just hope nobody clicks the reader view button in the top right, it would be just terrible if they got an ad free, paywall free version of the site

[–] TedZanzibar@feddit.uk 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I do that a lot on my phone but keep forgetting it's a thing on desktop for some reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

"Append...before", AKA "prepend"!

[–] abbenm@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Wow, I feel like the most upvoted solutions here don't work, and meanwhile some obvious and widely known alternatives are being completely overlooked.

❌ Inspect Element - many modern sites don't even include the full article in the paywalled html, so this wouldn't work. Also sitting there and mousing over elements and deleting them one by one, is tedious, it's easy to accidentally delete an element that encloses the content you intended to keep, or to drive yourself crazy trying to figure out how elements are nested.

❌ Ublock Zapper - a similar to the above, won't work on stub articles, and just janky because you're manually zapping things

❌ Disabled JavaScript - Similar to the above, same problem because many articles are stubs anyway. And the HTML layers that block your view don't have to be done with JavaScript.

❌ Rapid copy and paste of the article to notepad or rapidly printing the screen - similar problem to the above, lots of places just post the stub of an article, and besides nobody should live their life this way rapidly trying to print screen or copy everything. If you're trying to do a quick copy you're going to grab all kinds of gobbledygunk from the page and probably have to manually filter it out.

❌ Reader Mode - Your browsers reader mode will be hit and miss because, again, many sites post stub articles, and it's possible the pay wall stuff will just get formatted into the reader mode along with an incomplete article.

βœ… Archive.is - works!

βœ… Pocket and Instapaper - amazingly, nobody has mentioned these even though they're probably the longest running (dating back to 2007-2008), possibly most widely known, and most consistent solutions that still work to this day. They keep their own local caches of articles, so it's not depending on the full content being visible on the page.

βœ… Other dedicated extensions - Dedicated browser extensions seem to work, but be careful what you're signing yourself up for.

πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ Brave - It works, but, it's a Chromium supported browser, so ultimately Google controls the destiny and can drive Chromium to incorporate fundamental frameworks supporting DRM and pushing their preferred web standards.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I always break the ctrl key right off my keyboard when I get a new computer so I don't accidentally do this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago

Archive.ph >12ft.io

[–] Pickle_Jr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Firefox has a button that shows up in the url that kind of turns the webpage into an e-book-esque view that pops up for most articles (especially Pay Wall)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] trespasser69@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Thank you so much! I already did it! (Smash Ctrl+P as fast as possible)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

DO NOT DISABLE JAVASCRIPT USING AN EXTENSIONS BECAUSE THAT WILL MAKE TRACKING STOP WORKING AND BYPASS PAYWALLS.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago

not NOT use firefox' reading mode.

[–] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Absolutely do not inspect elements and start deleting stuff! Leave them alone!

[–] MooseTheDog@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

If a website sends all the data of an article to you, it's yours. They can't take it away. There's no basis to make the argument anything is owed to the website at that point.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Many sites don't work like that and don't even load the content from the server before the paywall check.

But I have a trick that work 100% of the time. Just don't read those sites.

I get that journalism and entertainment magazines have workers and need to be paid BUT:

They were getting paid when I could pay a cheap physical newspaper if I want to read it and usually had those for free anyway. As you'll get newspapers on most public places and one single newspaper would serve a whole family. In my house we didn't really paid more than 4€ a month and got physical things that you could just keep. Now with digital distribution you own nothing and it is far more expensive. So... No. Also they get a ton of public money through institutional advertisement, so I'm already basically paying for them without getting access to their content.

So unless they are willing to change their model I'll just refuse to read them. I'm happier without their clickbaits anyway.

[–] abbenm@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So unless they are willing to change their model I’ll just refuse to live.

Wait what

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tilefan@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

my browser always asks if I want the simplified view which always bypasses the paywall

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

And never, EVER disable JavaScript on that website and reload the page! Not even if your Ad blocker lets you selectively do it.

[–] Venicon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Will someone PLEASE think of the shareholders?!

[–] attero@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 month ago

You would never use DuckDuckGo as your default search engine and then type !archiveis in front of your urlbar visiting a news site.

[–] mayhair@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 month ago

I just use Bypass Paywalls Clean, or failing that, archive.vn.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί